Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / ASCI 516 7

ASCI 516 7

Management

ASCI 516 7.3 - Case Study Analysis: The Crash of Air Florida Flight 90 - Pilot Training and CRM Failures (PLG1)

Overview

Air Florida was a small intrastate carrier that expanded rapidly after the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. Both pilots of Flight 90 were hired during this period of rapid growth. For this case study, watch the video and review the NTSB report, focusing on both aircrew training and multiple CRM issues.

Watch the video Plane Crash in the Potomac (50:13 - ERAU - Alexander Street). (Links to an external site.)

Review the NTSB accident report: Air Floriida, Inc. Boeing 737-222, N62AF - Collision With 14th Street Bridge, Near Washington National Airport. Washington, D.C. January 13, 1982 (PDF - ERAU Hunt Library) (Links to an external site.)

 Case Study Analysis Requirements

Prepare a 3-5 page paper (APA format, double-spaced, not including cover page) analyzing the crash of AF Flight 90. You will evaluate the performance of the crew (and other teammates such as ATC, dispatch, etc.) with respect to this module's lesson on Aircrew Training and CRM. Appraise the qualifications of the crew and highlight any potential deficiencies. How might simulator training have been used to correct these deficiencies? What CRM failures can you identify? Also, include a discussion of the principles of 6th Generation CRM/Threat and Error Management. Do not just summarize the events; include a critical analysis! (Links to an external site.)

 Tip: For ideas on analyzing case studies in this course with respect to TEM, refer to the Threat & Error Management

 presentation (public domain from the U.S. Navy (Links to an external site.)) or the Threat and Error Management (TEM) and Line Operations Safety Assessment (LOSA) Training (PDF)/FAA

 

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

 Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity.

Rubric

ASCI 516 7.3 MSA GR Case Study Rubric

ASCI 516 7.3 MSA GR Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis/Interpretation/Application

The writing is demonstrative of student selection and performance of appropriate analysis, evaluation, and/or synthesis of material relevant to the subject topic. Topical focus and relevancy is identified and includes conclusions or recommendations. In addition, it demonstrates that the student has gained understanding of the topic beyond the information presented in the readings.

40 pts

Excellent | 36-40 points

90-100%

35 pts

Average | 32-25 points

80-89%

28 pts

Below Average | 28-31 points

70-79%

27 pts

Failing | 0-27 points

0-69%

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting References

Chose supporting references with clearly identifiable and comparable information applicable to the topic.

30 pts

Excellent | 27-30 points

26 pts

Average | 24-26 points

23 pts

Below Average | 21-23 points

20 pts

Failing | 0-20 points

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Mechanics

Uses proper APA citations and reference formatting; grammatically sound and free of spelling errors, follows required formatting rules, including required word count; and fully addresses given assignment.

30 pts

Excellent | 27-30 points

26 pts

Average | 24-26 points

23 pts

Below Average | 21-23 points

20 pts

Failing | 0-20 points

30 pts

Total Points: 100

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

14.99 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions