Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / ASCI 516 7
ASCI 516 7.3 - Case Study Analysis: The Crash of Air Florida Flight 90 - Pilot Training and CRM Failures (PLG1)
Air Florida was a small intrastate carrier that expanded rapidly after the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. Both pilots of Flight 90 were hired during this period of rapid growth. For this case study, watch the video and review the NTSB report, focusing on both aircrew training and multiple CRM issues.
Watch the video Plane Crash in the Potomac (50:13 - ERAU - Alexander Street). (Links to an external site.)
Review the NTSB accident report: Air Floriida, Inc. Boeing 737-222, N62AF - Collision With 14th Street Bridge, Near Washington National Airport. Washington, D.C. January 13, 1982 (PDF - ERAU Hunt Library) (Links to an external site.)
Prepare a 3-5 page paper (APA format, double-spaced, not including cover page) analyzing the crash of AF Flight 90. You will evaluate the performance of the crew (and other teammates such as ATC, dispatch, etc.) with respect to this module's lesson on Aircrew Training and CRM. Appraise the qualifications of the crew and highlight any potential deficiencies. How might simulator training have been used to correct these deficiencies? What CRM failures can you identify? Also, include a discussion of the principles of 6th Generation CRM/Threat and Error Management. Do not just summarize the events; include a critical analysis! (Links to an external site.)
Tip: For ideas on analyzing case studies in this course with respect to TEM, refer to the Threat & Error Management
presentation (public domain from the U.S. Navy (Links to an external site.)) or the Threat and Error Management (TEM) and Line Operations Safety Assessment (LOSA) Training (PDF)/FAA
Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity.
This activity supports Module Objective(s) 2-5, 7, & 8 and Learning Outcome(s) 8, 10, & 12.
ASCI 516 7.3 MSA GR Case Study Rubric
|
ASCI 516 7.3 MSA GR Case Study Rubric |
||||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis/Interpretation/Application The writing is demonstrative of student selection and performance of appropriate analysis, evaluation, and/or synthesis of material relevant to the subject topic. Topical focus and relevancy is identified and includes conclusions or recommendations. In addition, it demonstrates that the student has gained understanding of the topic beyond the information presented in the readings. |
|
40 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting References Chose supporting references with clearly identifiable and comparable information applicable to the topic. |
|
30 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Mechanics Uses proper APA citations and reference formatting; grammatically sound and free of spelling errors, follows required formatting rules, including required word count; and fully addresses given assignment. |
|
30 pts |
||||
|
Total Points: 100 |
||||||
