Trusted by Students Everywhere
Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee

Human-written only.

24/7 Support

Anytime, anywhere.

Plagiarism Free

100% Original.

Expert Tutors

Masters & PhDs.

100% Confidential

Your privacy matters.

On-Time Delivery

Never miss a deadline.

Suppose the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be MD=300+5q, and the (private) cost and benefit are given by MC=100+2q and MB=D-2q, where D is not known

Marketing Dec 28, 2020

Suppose the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be

MD=300+5q, and the (private) cost and benefit are given by

MC=100+2q and MB=D-2q, where D is not known.

a)If d=1000, what would be the optimal quantity? What tax would be necessary in order for that to be the equilibrium quantity?

b)Suppose that, based on the result from part (a), a cap-and-trade system is imposed to allow the optimal quantity of pollution to be produced. If D=900, what would be the dead-weight loss associated with having the wrong quantity?

c)Suppose that, based on the result from part (a), a tax is imposed to allow the optimal quantity of pollution to be produced. If D=900, what would be the dead-weight loss associated with the wrong tax level?

d)If D is not exactly known, which is likely to give better results, a cap-and-trade system or a tax? What would be the answer to this question if MD were 300+3Q instead of 300+5q

Expert Solution

A.

At D=1000, equilibrium quantity and Marginal Private Benefit (MPB) would be:

MB=MC100+2q=D−2q100+2q=1000−2q4q=900q=225MB=100+2(225)=550MB=MC100+2q=D−2q100+2q=1000−2q4q=900q=225MB=100+2(225)=550

Optimum quantity is:

MD=MB300+5q=D−2q300+5q=1000−2q7q=700q=100MD=300+5(100)=800MD=MB300+5q=D−2q300+5q=1000−2q7q=700q=100MD=300+5(100)=800

To bring q to the equilibrium quantity to 225 from 100, tax equivalent to external damage (MD) or external cost is needed. That is MD-MC

=MD−MC=800−550=250=MD−MC=800−550=250

B.

If D=900, optimal quantity is:

MD=MB300+5q1=D−2q1300+5q1=900−2q17q=600q1=85.71MD1=300+5(85.71)=728.55MD=MB300+5q1=D−2q1300+5q1=900−2q17q=600q1=85.71MD1=300+5(85.71)=728.55

Deadweight loss associated would be:

=0.5(MD−MD1)(q−q1)=0.5(800−728.55)(1000−900)=3572.5=0.5(MD−MD1)(q−q1)=0.5(800−728.55)(1000−900)=3572.5

C.

With D=900 the correct amount of tax imposed should be:

=MD−MC=728.55−550=178.55=MD−MC=728.55−550=178.55

and tax imposed=250, the extra amount of tax would be:

=250−178.55=71.45DWL=0.5(71.45)(1000−900)=3572.5=250−178.55=71.45DWL=0.5(71.45)(1000−900)=3572.5

Where DWL is deadweight loss.

D.

Considering D is not known, cap and trade system is better one. The deadweight loss would be minimum because the sellers can trade whatever marginal damage they created. Tax is ideal only for scenario when exact D is known, otherwise there would be deadweight loss.

If MD=300+3q, optimal quantity is:

MD=MB300+3q=D−2q300+3q=1000−2q5q=700q=140MD=300+3(140)=720MD=MB300+3q=D−2q300+3q=1000−2q5q=700q=140MD=300+3(140)=720

Tax would be:

=720−550=170=720−550=170

As here, marginal damage is less, tax can be imposed. Deadweight loss would be less.

Archived Solution
Unlocked Solution

You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.

Already a member? Sign In
Important Note: This solution is from our archive and has been purchased by others. Submitting it as-is may trigger plagiarism detection. Use it for reference only.

For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.

Or get 100% fresh solution
Get Custom Quote
Secure Payment