Homework answers / question archive / BTM 102 Signature Assignment Exemplary (9-10) Accomplished (7-8) Developing (4-6) Incomplete (1-3) Missing (0) Introduction – (10%)

BTM 102 Signature Assignment Exemplary (9-10) Accomplished (7-8) Developing (4-6) Incomplete (1-3) Missing (0) Introduction – (10%)

Writing

Share With

BTM 102 Signature Assignment Exemplary (9-10) Accomplished (7-8) Developing (4-6) Incomplete (1-3) Missing (0) Introduction – (10%). The student gives a concise description of the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Introduction concisely references the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Introduction references the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith so that these are not seriously impeded by omissions. Introduction mostly references the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith but leaves some ambiguities in place with regard to these elements. Introduction somewhat references the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith but leaves many ambiguities. The required elements of the introduction are entirely missing. Textual Analysis – (60%). The student demonstrates an understanding of the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Textual analysis is both thorough and extensive so that the student demonstrates an understanding of the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Textual analysis is both thorough and extensive and demonstrates a good understanding of the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Textual analysis is somewhat thorough and extensive and mostly demonstrates an understanding of the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Textual analysis demonstrates a minimal understanding of the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Textual analysis demonstrates little or no understanding of the similarity of Jesus' teachings and the writings of Paul as to the centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Conclusion – (10%). The student clearly summarizes the major concepts about the similarity of Jesus' teachings The conclusion is strong and leaves readers with a feeling that they understand what the The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends. The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends. There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends. There is no conclusion at all. Exemplary (9-10) Accomplished (7-8) Developing (4-6) Incomplete (1-3) Missing (0) and the writings of writer is "getting Paul as to the at." centrality of love and mission of the Christian faith. Grammar & Spelling – (10%). Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Grammar and spelling errors are so prevalent in the paper that it is difficult to understand the content of the paper. References – (10%). Citations within text are correctly formatted and connected to a reference page that is alphabetized, all sources use correct format, and quotations include page #'s. All of the references are correctly formatted using approved citation protocols. Almost all of the references are correctly formatted using approved citation protocols. The majority of the references correctly use approved citation format. A few of the references correctly use approved citation format. Approved citation reference formatting is not evident.