Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Level 5 International HRM: Element 2, Individual case study, 60% Module Leader: Johan Tjok-a-Tam Key Details and Requirements Submission Date: 27-May-22, no later than 16:30 Learning Outcomes to be achieved: LO1 Be able to evaluate and discuss key aspects of current IHRM theory and practice LO2 Evaluate and apply the major cultural frameworks LO3 Analysis and discuss how national cultures differ LO4 Discuss the impact of culture on IHRM practices and managerial values Assessment details: Element 2, Individual case study analysis (1,500 words +/- 10%), 60% Referencing: Students are expected to use Harvard Referencing throughout their assignments where required

Level 5 International HRM: Element 2, Individual case study, 60% Module Leader: Johan Tjok-a-Tam Key Details and Requirements Submission Date: 27-May-22, no later than 16:30 Learning Outcomes to be achieved: LO1 Be able to evaluate and discuss key aspects of current IHRM theory and practice LO2 Evaluate and apply the major cultural frameworks LO3 Analysis and discuss how national cultures differ LO4 Discuss the impact of culture on IHRM practices and managerial values Assessment details: Element 2, Individual case study analysis (1,500 words +/- 10%), 60% Referencing: Students are expected to use Harvard Referencing throughout their assignments where required

Management

Level 5 International HRM: Element 2, Individual case study, 60% Module Leader: Johan Tjok-a-Tam Key Details and Requirements Submission Date: 27-May-22, no later than 16:30 Learning Outcomes to be achieved: LO1 Be able to evaluate and discuss key aspects of current IHRM theory and practice LO2 Evaluate and apply the major cultural frameworks LO3 Analysis and discuss how national cultures differ LO4 Discuss the impact of culture on IHRM practices and managerial values Assessment details: Element 2, Individual case study analysis (1,500 words +/- 10%), 60% Referencing: Students are expected to use Harvard Referencing throughout their assignments where required. Please follow the Harvard Referencing Handbook for all your assignments at the ULBS. Submission Method: Turnitin - Your work needs to be put through Turnitin. All submissions will be electronically checked for plagiarism. You have the option to upload your work ahead of the deadline, ULBS will be reviewing your last submission only. Turnitin cannot be used for late submissions. In such case, you should send your work to Turnitin-submissions@law.ac.uk If you experience issues when uploading your work, please email it by the deadline to Turnitin-submissions@law.ac.uk Please note that you can deviate +- 10% from the word limit stated on each assignment. ASSESSMENT DETAILS I. Your task You will be given a case study to read, which focuses on International CSR aspects, taking place within the multinational company Nike. Your Task Write and submit an essay, in which you address the following questions: 1. What is the potential for the HR function in Nike, to play a part in the company's desire to be seen as a good corporate citizen? 2. Provide a critical reflection and discussion of Nike’s human resource management strategies, in particular the approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). What are the strengths and weaknesses of their approach? Assessment Criteria Class Scale Attributes Marks FIRST (Excellent) Exceptional 1st The work displays exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding. Evidence of detailed analysis / application deploying research in order to advance work and/or direct arguments. Written in a fluent style with a clear focus and structure: excellent use of grammar, spelling and language conventions. Performance deemed to be beyond that which one would expect at this Level and aligned to the learning outcomes set. 95-100% High 1st Excellent knowledge and understanding demonstrating a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is comprehensive accurate and relevant to the learning outcomes. Evidence of reflective insight / application and ability to select a wide range of appropriate sources, theories, and principles from reading and research. Consideration of opposing arguments. Excellent demonstration of relevant skills; excellent communication, with very good use of grammar, spelling and language conventions. 90-94% Mid 1st 80-89% Low 1st 70-79% UPPER SECOND (Very Good) High 2:1 Very good knowledge and understanding informed by accurate interpretation and awareness of related facts / concepts. Demonstrates an ability to use a structured communication approach to sustain a relevant and coherent argument. Evidence of appropriate reading / research. The work is well structured and organised with good use of grammar, spelling and language conventions. 68% Mid 2:1 65% Low 2:1 62% LOWER SECOND (Good) High 2:2 Good insight and understanding of related information, such as principles, theories, evidence and techniques. Work demonstrates descriptive application of knowledge. Limited evidence of ability to sustain a relevant and coherent argument. Some evidence of appropriate reading / research to advance work / direct arguments. May not directly answer the question or fully align to the learning outcomes. Reasonable use of grammar, spelling and language conventions. 58% Mid 2:2 55% Low 2:2 52% THIRD (Sufficient) High 3rd Incomplete breadth and depth of substantive knowledge. Sufficient display of theory to practice application using terminology, basic facts and concepts. Work is generally descriptive and lacking in theoretical and reflective insights or application. Arguments may be weak or poorly constructed and are too simplistic. Limited attention paid to quality and appropriateness of resources. Poorly structure work with no clear sense of organisation of the material. The work may display evidence of poor grammar and spelling. 48% Mid 3rd 45% Low 3rd 42% FAIL (Insufficient) Marginal Fail Insufficient knowledge and understanding of the area of study; the answer may show some awareness of the area but misses many important facts and concepts and makes major errors. Work is descriptive with a limited use of sources to advance work. Arguments are weak or poorly constructed. Work that is limited in coherence, clarity and effective communication. 38% Mid Fail 35% Low Fail 32% FAIL (Inadequate) Little relevant knowledge but with some level of awareness of the subject area. Fails to show any analysis / application and does not meet the learning outcomes. Fails to use data, citations or other sources in the correct manner. The work is descriptive and any arguments are partial and unsubstantiated. Poor communication skills which hamper ability to demonstrate achievement of outcomes. 20-29% FAIL (Severely Inadequate) Work is severely inadequate and demonstrates little or confused awareness of the subject area. Poorly informed descriptive narrative with little evidence-based argument. Use of sources is inappropriate and arguments are unsubstantiated and unstructured. Very poor communication skills. 10-19% FAIL (Profoundly Inadequate) Virtually no attempt – the candidate may have written a few sentences but without addressing the question in any way. Learning outcomes are not met. There is no real attention to any presentation norms or structure to the narrative. 0-9%

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

18.99

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions