University of Houston, Downtown PHIL 1301 1)What kind of propositions truth value must be settled only by the meanings of the words? What kind of proposition's truth value must not be settled only by the meanings of the words? An argument can be true

University of Houston, Downtown

PHIL 1301

1)What kind of propositions truth value must be settled only by the meanings of the words?

2. What kind of proposition's truth value must not be settled only by the meanings of the words?
3. An argument can be true.
4. We define a ‘premise' in philosophy as something that has no truth value.
5. A sound argument can contain a false premise.
6. If proposition that is not part of an argument cannot be true or false.
7. Suppose Anselm’s argument is valid. Does that tell us whether the premises in it are true?
8. If an argument is valid and has all true premises, could it beg the question?
9. If the structure of an argument does not change, can the argument's validity change?
10. If a proposition is false and you believe it is false, then your belief is true.
11. Do all arguments beg the question?
12. Is there a maximum number of propositions an argument must contain?
13. What is the minimum number of propositions an argument must contain?
14. What is the antecedent in this proposition? "If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding."
15. "If it tastes good, then it's healthy." Is that a conditional?
16. Is it more reasonable to see the proposition linked to number 15 as analytic than synthetic?
17. Must an argument have a conclusion in philosophy?
18. All premises are propositions.
19. Here's an argument: A - If everyone is entitled to their own opinion, then people who think that others are not entitled to their opinions are entitled to their opinions. B - Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. C - then people who think that others are not entitled to their opinions are