help in homework

New User?

Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / This Module Review assignment requires you to answer complex questions that are related to the topics presented in the module readings and have been designed to develop your critical thinking skills

This Module Review assignment requires you to answer complex questions that are related to the topics presented in the module readings and have been designed to develop your critical thinking skills

Management

This Module Review assignment requires you to answer complex questions that are related to the topics presented in the module readings and have been designed to develop your critical thinking skills.

Use the course textbook AND outside primary sources to obtain data that supports your answers. Follow the guidelines in the Module Review Questions Requirements section, including using current APA style and pasting the questions in bold before each answer.

Questions

  1. Explain the concept of a crawler search engine.
  2. How has the utilization of mobile technologies impacted search engine optimization practices?
  3. Describe how mashups create new benefits and functionality from existing data or information.

Your document submission is due by the posted due date. Your instructor will use the rubric for evaluating and grading your submission.

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

 This assessment aligns with Module Objectives 1, 2, & 3 and Learning Outcome 5.

Rubric

MGMT 221 4.3 Module Review: Questions Rubric

MGMT 221 4.3 Module Review: Questions Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
25.0 pts

Excellent - The answers contained a VERY HIGH level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.

 22.5 pts

Very Good - The answers contained a HIGH level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.

 20.0 pts

Satisfactory - The answers contained a MODERATE level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.

 17.5 pts

Near Failing - The answers contained a LOW level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.

 0.0 pts

Failing - The answers contained NO coherent level of critical analysis.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
25.0 pts

Excellent - ALL of the questions were FULLY answered.

 22.5 pts

Very Good - Satisfactory - ONE question was NOT FULLY answered.

 20.0 pts

Satisfactory - TWO questions were NOT FULLY answered.

 17.5 pts

Near Failing - THREE questions were NOT FULLY answered.

 0.0 pts

Failing - ONE answer was COMPLETELY missing.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy
15.0 pts

Excellent - The answers are COMPLETELY accurate.

 14.0 pts

Very Good - The answers are MOSTLY accurate with ONE error.

 11.0 pts

Satisfactory - The answers are SOMEWHAT accurate with TWO errors.

 9.0 pts

Near Failing - The answers are SOMEWHAT inaccurate with MORE THAN TWO errors.

 0.0 pts

Failing - ALL answers are COMPLETELY inaccurate.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics
15.0 pts

Excellent - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused AND the data was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

 13.0 pts

Very Good - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused BUT there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

 11.0 pts

Satisfactory - SOME sentences were not properly structured and carefully focused AND there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

 9.0 pts

Near Failing - SOME sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

 0.0 pts

Failing - MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Research
10.0 pts

Excellent - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings AND outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.

 9.0 pts

Very Good - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings AND outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.

 8.0 pts

Satisfactory - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course readings OR outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.

 7.0 pts

Near Failing - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course readings OR outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.

 0.0 pts

Failing - NO evidence that scholarly research was conducted AND NO terminology from the source materials was presented.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style
10.0 pts

Excellent - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with NO errors.

 9.0 pts

Very Good - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with ONE error.

 8.0 pts

Satisfactory - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with TWO errors.

 7.0 pts

Near Failing - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with THREE errors.

 0.0 pts

Failing - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with MORE than THREE errors.

10.0 pts

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions