Homework answers / question archive / Over the last 10 years the federal government has dramatically increased the number of regulations pertaining to transportation safety and security

Over the last 10 years the federal government has dramatically increased the number of regulations pertaining to transportation safety and security

Management

Share With

Over the last 10 years the federal government has dramatically increased the number of
regulations pertaining to transportation safety and security. Two such regulations are
presented below. Review them and answer the case questions.
Transportation Safety—December 18, 2017, is set as the implementation day for electronic
logging devices (ELD) in trucks. ELDs will replace paper logbooks for truck drivers to provide
better control over their compliance with Hours of Service regulations that are designed to
combat driver fatigue. It is believed that paper logbooks are subject to fraud and allow drivers
to exceed 11 hours of driving time per day and more than 60 hours in a seven-day period. On
the other hand, drivers will not be able to easily exceed the limits as ELDs are not easily
manipulated. The cost of ELD purchase, installation, and operation is the responsibility of the
trucking company or the independent truck driver.
ELD critics believe that, at a cost of up to $2,500 per unit, the expense of ELD adoption is
excessive for small companies and independent truckers. They also project productivity
decreases of 15 percent fewer miles traveled per day and nominal rate increases of 5 to 10
percent for loads booked on the spot market. Proponents indicate that ELDs will improve the
accuracy of HOS logs, improve Hours of Service compliance, reduce falsification that occurs
with paper logbooks, and reduce crashes by over 1,800 annually.
Transportation Security—After the terrorist attack on the United States on September 11, 2001,
the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was established and tasked with
implementing regulations to protect the safety of passengers using the U.S. airline industry. TSA
manages Secure Flight, a risk-based prescreening program to identify high-risk passengers;
conducts passenger screening for illegal items before they enter the secure area of airports;
and screens checked bags for explosives and other dangerous items. TSA has implemented
congressionally mandated security fees to help finance the increased cost of securing the
nation's aviation transportation system. This passenger paid fee was increased to $11.20 per
round trip ticket in 2014.
Critics of TSA screening programs complain that these policies increase travel time, invade
privacy, are of limited effectiveness, and increase costs for passengers and airlines. Proponents
of these policies argue that the safety of air passengers is more important than delays or
increased costs.

CASE QUESTIONS
1. In each of the scenarios presented in the case, opponents and proponents have
divergent views of government regulations. One view is on the public benefit, the
other is on the cost to individuals and/or private industry. How can you decide which
view to accept?
2. In each of the scenarios earlier, identify the benefits versus the costs for both
viewpoints.
3. Should the government intervene in setting regulations to increase transportation
safety and security? Or should private industry take on this role? Discuss