Natural Law Theory suggests that an act is considered "right" if the act is consistent with nature's design, order and purpose and an act is wrong if the act is inconsistent with nature's design, order and purpose

Natural Law Theory suggests that an act is considered "right" if the act is consistent with nature's design, order and purpose and an act is wrong if the act is inconsistent with nature's design, order and purpose. What would be some acts that Natural Law Theory would suggest are wrong? What would be some actions seen in nature, and therefore consistent with nature's design, order, and purpose, that Natural Law Theory would argue are right, but the vast majority of human societies view that act as wrong? Based on thetextbook reading and your personal opinion, what do you think is the role, if any, for nature in determining what is right and wrong for humankind? Due Tuesday, September 08 by midnight