Homework answers / question archive / Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper Refer to the PICOT you developed for your evidence-based practice project proposal

Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper Refer to the PICOT you developed for your evidence-based practice project proposal

Nursing

Share With

---

Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper

Refer to the PICOT you developed for your evidence-based practice project proposal. If your PICOT required revision, include those revisions in this assignment. You will use your PICOT paper for all subsequent assignments you develop as part of your evidence-based practice project proposal in this course and in NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

 

Write a 750-1,000-word paper that describes your PICOT.

 

Describe the population's demographics and health concerns.

Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention and explain how your proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus.

Compare your intervention to previous practice or research.

Explain what the expected outcome is for the intervention.

Describe the time for implementing the intervention and evaluating the outcome.

Explain how nursing science, social determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population.

Create an Appendix for your paper and attach the PICOT. Be sure to review feedback from your previous submission and revise your PICOT accordingly.

Complete the "APA Writing Checklist" to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as the final appendix at the end of your paper.

Refer to the "Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview" document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

 

You are required to cite at least four to six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

 

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

 

 

 

Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper - Rubric

 

Collapse All Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper - Rubric

Collapse All

Population Demographics and Health Concerns

 

7.5 points

 

Criteria Description

Population Demographics and Health Concerns

 

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are accurate and thoroughly described using substantial evidence.

 

4. Good

6.9 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are described using sufficient evidence.

 

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are summarized. More information and supporting evidence are needed.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are incorrect or only partially described.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are not described.

 

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention

 

19.5 points

 

Criteria Description

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention

 

5. Excellent

19.5 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is well-developed and clearly described. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is thorough.

 

4. Good

17.94 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is described. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is adequate. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

 

3. Satisfactory

17.16 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is outlined. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is general. Some aspects are unclear. More information is needed.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

15.6 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is incomplete. It is unclear how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is omitted.

 

Comparison of Intervention to Current Research

 

18 points

 

Criteria Description

Comparison of Intervention to Current Research

 

5. Excellent

18 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is thorough and clearly presented.

 

4. Good

16.56 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is adequately presented.

 

3. Satisfactory

15.84 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is generally presented. Some areas are vague.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.4 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is incomplete.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is omitted.

 

Expected Outcome for Intervention

 

15 points

 

Criteria Description

Expected Outcome for Intervention

 

5. Excellent

15 points

The expected outcome for the intervention is thoroughly explained using substantial evidence.

 

4. Good

13.8 points

The expected outcome for the intervention is explained using sufficient evidence.

 

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is summarized. More

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is incomplete.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is omitted.

 

Time Estimated for Implementing Intervention and Evaluating Outcome

 

15 points

 

Criteria Description

Time Estimated for Implementing Intervention and Evaluating Outcome

 

5. Excellent

15 points

A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

 

4. Good

13.8 points

A description of the timelines is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

 

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the timeline is not included.

 

Support (B)

 

15 points

 

Criteria Description

Support for Population Health Management for Selected Population (C 4.1)

 

5. Excellent

15 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is thorough. The narrative is insightful and demonstrates an understanding of how the various aspects contribute to population health management for selected populations.

 

4. Good

13.8 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is adequate. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

 

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is summarized. More information and support are needed.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is incomplete. There are major inaccuracies.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is omitted.

 

Appendix

 

7.5 points

 

Criteria Description

Appendix

 

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.

 

4. Good

6.9 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.

 

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The appendix and required resources are omitted.

 

Required Sources

 

7.5 points

 

Criteria Description

Required Sources

 

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

 

4. Good

6.9 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

 

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not included.

 

Thesis Development and Purpose

 

10.5 points

 

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

 

5. Excellent

10.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

 

4. Good

9.66 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

 

3. Satisfactory

9.24 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

 

2. Less Than Satisfactory

8.4 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall