Homework answers / question archive / How do the concept of technology structures and social boundaries for organizations apply to the three perspectives (natural, rational, and open)? Hi, I requested help with this question, but unfortunately, the person that helped me did not answer it correctly

How do the concept of technology structures and social boundaries for organizations apply to the three perspectives (natural, rational, and open)? Hi, I requested help with this question, but unfortunately, the person that helped me did not answer it correctly

Business

Share With

How do the concept of technology structures and social boundaries

for organizations apply to the three perspectives (natural, rational, and open)?
Hi, I requested help with this question, but unfortunately, the person that helped me did not answer it correctly. The question is about how technology, structures, social boundaries apply (or relate) to the three perspectives (Natural, Rational, and open system perspectives).
Below is what the tutor provided:
?The concept of technology structures and social boundaries for organizations to apply the three perspectives are: natural, rational, open:
Organizations are elements that are groups of members. However, the reason for the organization and the connection between the inspirations of the members to work in the company to accomplish the objectives realize alternate points of view.
1)Rational perspective.
2) Natural perspective.
3) Open perspective.


Explanation:
The concept of technology structures and social boundaries for organizations to apply the three perspectives are: natural, rational, open:
Organizations are elements that are groups of members. However, the reason for the organization and the connection between the inspirations of the members to work in the company to accomplish the objectives realize alternate points of view.
1.Rational perspective:
The rational organization is commonly sorted out in a way that would seem "rational" when one differences its structure to its motivation. This restricted perspective on objectivity doesn't address the good or moral situation of an association. Rather, the objective view concentrates most on the structure and its motivation. The reason draws its members, and it is the very much characterized structure that makes the association balanced.
2.Natural perspective:
The characteristic framework point of view takes the analysis to an alternate level and disagrees with the restricted meaning of a balanced framework. Since the sane framework doesn't consider the social interests of the people of the associations, naturalists don't feel that a judicious organization is reasonable. Naturalists disagree with the realist dispute that individuals from the association are individuals because of their responsibility to accomplishing the objectives of the association. The purpose behind this is "there is now and again a dissimilarity between the expressed and the 'genuine' objectives sought after by associations between the purported or authority objectives that are reported and the real or activity objectives that can be watched.
3.Open perspective:
The system turns into an open, or natural, framework, while the structure of the association isn't simply constrained by the dividers or procedures inside the association. What's more, the association is formed, upheld, and penetrated by the earth around the association. A significant topic of the open framework is that there is less spotlight on formal or casual structure than the segments that keep the association pushing ahead. Open structures are best seen as a framework rather than only a solitary association. To turn into an open framework, an association must advance in authoritative development to a state of having the option to continue itself through dependence on reliant assets and information sources.