Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / MGMT 4402 Human Resource Management MGMT 4402 HR Exercise Drinking on the Job Dr

MGMT 4402 Human Resource Management MGMT 4402 HR Exercise Drinking on the Job Dr

Management

MGMT 4402 Human Resource Management MGMT 4402 HR Exercise Drinking on the Job Dr. Cody Logan Chullen, Ph.D. | Associate Professor of Management email: chullenc@ecu.edu | Office: Bate 3204 | tel. (252) 737-4608 Readings Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright (2022). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (9th Ed.) McGraw Hill. ISBN-13#: 9781264131143 Hear Ye’ , Hear Ye This exercise must be typed and completed individually. Evidence of group work on this exercise will be considered a violation of our academic integrity policy. Furthermore, you are strictly forbidden from sharing your answers (i.e. write-up) with anyone currently enrolled, previously enrolled, or to be enrolled in this course in the future. Required Lengt There are no speci c length requirements for your write-up. Generally, a well done write-up is probably about 2-3 pages (double-spaced). Required Formattin Generally, documents in Size 12, Times New Roman Font with 1” margins that are double-spaced are easiest for me to read. If you use references, they must follow the rules detailed in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th Edition. Please see our formatting document for this exercise in Canvas and prepare your answers accordingly. Chapter 3, p. 79-80; Chapter 11, 340-345 Viewings Due Dat This exercise must be submitted/uploaded through our LMS on or before the due date (11:59 p.m., ET) listed in the course schedule on your syllabus, unless approved otherwise by the instructor. Recorded Lectures on “Chapters 3 & 11” g ’ fi h e 1 MGMT 4402 Human Resource Management MGMT 4402 Learning Objectives/Goals 1. Upon completion of this exercise, you will be able to discuss employee alcoholism and organizational policies that address it. 2. Upon completion of this exercise, you will be able to discuss what constitutes suf cient proof for nding an employee rule infraction. General Instructions Read the incident that follows and answer these questions: 1. What course of action should the owner-manager have taken in addressing this matter? Should he/she have indicated to Werst that he/she suspected him of drinking on the job? Or was there an alternative method better suited to handling this situation? Defend your answer! 2. To what extent should the owner-manager go to try to catch Werst drinking on the job? How could evidence be collected without administering a breathalyzer or performing a blood alcohol test? 3. What action, if any, should the owner-manager take if Werst confesses to being an alcoholic? 4. Does the owner-manager presently have suf cient proof that Werst is working under the in uence of alcohol? 5. Critique the construction company’s alcoholism rule. Is it appropriate? Clear? What other information would you want to know about it? Incident A reputable northeastern construction company employs six experienced construction supervisors for its various construction jobs. These supervisors have the overall responsibility of hiring and ring and seeing that the construction proceeds as close to time and cost schedules as possible. They also have the responsibility of overall quality control of the construction. Larry Werst, age 55, has been a supervisor for this company for many years. He is never absent and has established a reputation for getting the job done right and close to schedule. He has supervised the construction of several prominent buildings and is now supervising the construction of a college fraternity house. Werst’s approach to handling his employees is rm and sometimes harsh. He does not allow any back talk, and everyone who works for him usually earns his or her pay or is not on the job for very long. The owner and manager of the company had become concerned about Werst because rumors were circulating that he was an alcoholic and that he drank on the job. The owner knew that Werst drank a lot and had a stormy home life, but he did not know whether he was drinking on the job. One day, when the manager was talking with Werst, he smelled alcohol on his breath. This fi fi fi fi fi fl 2 MGMT 4402 Human Resource Management MGMT 4402 had happened on several occasions when of ce and storeroom employees noticed the odor when they talked to him. Also, the storeroom clerk noticed that almost every day Werst would come into the store, buy two Cokes, and then leave in his company truck, presumably to go back to his job site. The manager decided to talk to Werst about this situation. When he confronted Werst with the rumors, his alcoholic breath, and the purchasing of two Cokes at a time, Werst denied that he was drinking on the job. He replied that the rumors were just that and that the two Cokes were for himself and his carpenter supervisor. The manager told him that he would have to let him go if he were caught drinking on the job. He reminded Werst that the rm’s progressive discipline system included a rule that states, ‘‘No employee is permitted to go on duty or remain on duty if he or she possesses, is under the in uence of, or is consuming an alcoholic beverage. Violation of this policy will result in dismissal.’’ About a year later, when the construction season was again in full swing, stories began circulating about Werst’s drinking. His fellow employees now pondered over the quart of milk he drank every day. They wondered if he spiked the milk and/or used it to cover his alcoholic breath. Sometimes his speech seemed slurred, but Werst was gravel-voiced and had sloppy speech habits anyway. The workers were amused by the stories he would tell about things that had happened to him. They were just stories, of course, but lately they were becoming pathetically farfetched and made no sense at all. The manager soon heard about some of the new rumors about Werst, and he wondered what he should do about the situation again. Werst still had never actually been caught drinking on the job. His construction project was proceeding satisfactorily, but it was a little behind schedule due to the inability to hire good carpenters and laborers at the beginning of the construction season. And worker turnover was perhaps somewhat higher on this project than the average turnover. fi fi fl 3 MGMT 4402 Human Resource Management MGMT 4402 Grading Rubric Excellent Good Fair Poor 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point You have met the learning objective(s). You have met the learning objective(s). You are approaching the learning objective(s). You have not met the learning objective(s). Your performance demonstrates mastery of this exercise’s learning goal(s). Your performance demonstrates partial mastery of this exercise’s learning goal(s). Your performance provides some evidence of meeting this exercise’s learning goal(s). Your performance provides little to no evidence of meeting this exercise’s learning goal(s). Notes: You are responsible for reviewing the debrief that accompanies this exercise when it becomes available. This debrief explains the key takeaways for our exercise and serves as my overall feedback to you. If you have speci c questions about your grade for this exercise you must contact me within 7 days of our debrief becoming available or within 7 days of receiving your grade (whichever occurs last). You will need to explain to me, based on your submitted work as contrasted with the exercise debrief, why you believe your work should be graded differently. There is a “duty to perform” clause attached to this document. You must complete this exercise in full (with meaningful effort) and meet its minimum requirements by its due date. If you fail to submit a fully completed exercise by its due date, there will be a 3.5% reduction to your nal grade in the course (in addition to earning a “0” for the exercise itself). Obviously, incomplete and/or late work will not be accepted. fi fi 4
 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Management Question Assignment

1. What course of action should the owner-manager have taken in addressing this matter? Should he/she have indicated to Werst that he/she suspected him of drinking on the job? Or was there an alternative method better suited to handling this situation? Defend your answer!

            According to Heaton & Tong (2016), reasonable decisions are determined by evidence in any given situation. Hence, Noe et al. (2009) supports this through concepts of human resource management. In the case of Werst, the first warning was enough to suggest that the manager had caught him in the act and he would fire him if he drank during working hours. In the second incident, he should have waited to see for himself the proof that Werner was drinking. It meant that he should have considered testing Werst for the possibility of alcohol consumption through a breathalyzer. Also, tests such as productivity during the working hours have to be undertaken to provide enough evidence of his misconduct. With such in place, then it would be right to fire him. In this case, the manager was wrong in using rumors to confront him, but right when he smelled him for the alcohol consumed during the time, he was warned about a possible firing outcome from his employment position. 

2. To what extent should the owner-manager go to try to catch Werst drinking on the job? How could evidence be collected without administering a breathalyzer or performing a blood alcohol test?

            The only extent is to monitor how he behaves during working hours. The workplace is the only place that can prove if he is drinking and the possibility of his habits affecting his work. However, when he is out of the workplace, it means that he can have all the rights to drink. The workplace environment has regulations that should be respected and implemented by all workers. This is important because it influences a standardized working outcome (Dalton & Villagran, 2018). Hence, tests such as breathalyzers, performance interviews, relationship aptitudes, and schedule experiments in relation to providing the best in the workplace are important for the manager to implement. They ensure that a worker such as Werst is able to remain dedicated in issues surrounding the workplace.

3. What action, if any, should the owner-manager take if Werst confesses to being an alcoholic?

            Confession is not enough to fire someone. Confession can be brought by pressure and other influences. Therefore, when Werst confesses of drinking, the owner-manager should consider proving the nature of the information provided to him before undertaking any actions. As an alcoholic, it is important for Werner to receive the required assistance. The owner-manager, after finding the validity of the information, should refer Werner to a psychologist. A psychologist would play a major role in dealing with the alcoholic syndrome, its symptoms, and influence (Noe et al., 2009). Having Werner in such a program assists him to become a better person and to ensure that he has a stable relationship with his family. Also, he remains productive in the workplace.

4. Does the owner-manager presently have sufficient proof that Werst is working under the influence of alcohol?

            The owner does not have sufficient proof that Werst is working under the influence of alcohol. The main reason is that he does not fire him during his first encounter with him. he only focuses on warning him against continuing with his drinking habits. Additionally, he goes forward to look into the issue, but finds out that there is nothing admissible about his behavior that can influence him to fire Werst. The nature of the stories and their unrealistic background also suggests that they do not have anything attached to his drinking habits. Other workers appear to telling lies compared to communicating about the issue faced by Werst.

5. Critique the construction company’s alcoholism rule. Is it appropriate? Clear? What other information would you want to know about it?

            The construction company’s alcoholism rule is clear about drinking. It is appropriate because it provides transparency in guiding employees in the workplace. It prevents them from drinking because of the nature of work they undertake. The construction company has a complex and delicate environment. It means that employees can experience accidents at any given time (Noe et al., 2009). Therefore, a sensitive workplace works with important and strong regulations that protect employees from harm and the company from fines and lawsuits launched by employees who experience accidents. Therefore, the company is right in its policies.

Related Questions