Articles review

Cui, Zheng & Zeng presented a peer-reviewed article that addresses a current issue by examining the cause and the effect. The authors have undergone the review process to understand the issue clearly. The impact factor of this peer-reviewed article by Cui, Zheng & Deng (2018) is also high, and it has focused on ways to change the community's perception towards some of the factors leading to water shortage.

Smadi, Al Theeb & Bawa’neh (2018) offers a peer-reviewed article that focuses on the logistics systems used in distributing drinking water after a disaster occurs. The article has been included in the key biographical database about the current issue. Also, the authors of this article have well perfected this issue before publishing this article.

Patel et al. (2020) present a journal that addresses the complications associated with water shortage and the measures needed in availing water to people with deferment needs. The purpose of this journal is one of the factors that makes it credible since the authors ensured that they assessed the most complex challenge in the community before presenting an article that addresses it. Further, as a current article that has been recently published, the credibility of the journal increases since one can relate to this challenge.

The journal by Deng was published in 2018 to create a solution to the current challenge facing the larger society. This article was presented to a community of people concerned about this topic and whose concern about the issue was relatively high. Moreover, this article is relevant since the author had completed significant research to understand the need to avail emergency water supply to respond to natural disasters.

The purpose of the article presented by Stute et al. (2017) was to explore the need to focus on reliable disaster management initiatives. This article is credible since the authors took notable time in analyzing some of the approaches that can be implemented to solve the issue. The other factor promoting the overall credibility of the source is that the peer review panel is more experienced concerning the issue.