After Robert Richet gave the poison again

to the dogs who survived the first dose, he was puzzled to
realize that the allergic symptoms were quicker to manifest themselves than how they did in the first
scenario. The outcome contradicted his results expectations. According to him, there was a deep hidden
relationship that existed between the dogs and the poison. He still could not see the connection even
after what happened in the second case. Later, he noted that simple observations that seemed
accidental was all that mattered and ones that gave results as opposed to deep thinking like how he
was doing. His findings laid on the fact that the dogs exhibited allergic symptoms quicker in the second
test than the first one. All he was supposed to do was find the reason why this occurred and he will get
the dogs' affliction to the poison.