Point Loma Nazarene University FCS 375 Module 5 Quiz 1)Throop and Purdom (2006) was in response to a previous researchers call for participatory focal practice in restoration

Point Loma Nazarene University

FCS 375

Module 5 Quiz

1)Throop and Purdom (2006) was in response to a previous researchers call for participatory focal practice in restoration. The call for focused participation in restoration is meant to:

2. Understanding the different sides of an argument is critical if negotiating compromise

agreeable to all stakeholders.

3. The WV DEP and DNR can be under heavy executive pressure to not enforce some of the mandates of the Clean Water Act. of the four lines of restoration thinking, which is most conducive to the current environment ethos most often typified by these state agencies.
4. Ehrenfeld (2000) suggests that some aspects of ecosystem function can be quantified

and measured in rates, and an ecosystem services redriven by consideration of human valuation. Which of the following two examples include both of an ecosystem function and an ecosystem service?

5. A reactive environmental policy does not protect against the loss of unknown future

opportunities.

6. The most important component in a restoration project is defining what are achievable goals and objectives.
7. Someone who is a proponent of assimilative thinking would think that the destruction of

a wetland in one area is an acceptable loss as long as the wetland was mitigated elsewhere.

8. In Star City, the Granville shopping center was built on previously mined land. The

nature of restoration that had taken place on the land was to simply re-vegetate. After building the parking lots and buildings, what is an example of an ecosystem service the engineers needed to artificially replicate?

9. The term participation paradox according to Throop and Purdom (2006) is best applied

to which of the following scenarios.