Instructions: IMPORTANT: You cannot use any other articles

Instructions:

IMPORTANT: You cannot use any other articles. Just focus the article that mentioned in this instruction. And follow the instructions strictly.

You will write a critique of 700 words. The format of the critique will be:

· Title of the paper: reVISit: Looking Under the Hood of Interactive Visualization Studies

(Video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr4qmAPv-2g)

· URL of the paper (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445382)

· Contribution summary: One paragraph summary of paper contributions: what’s the main idea of the paper? What did they find? Why does it matter?

· Strengths: 1-2 great things about the paper (one paragraph per each thing you observe). Why do you think it is great? Why do you like it?

· Weaknesses: 2-3 things that can be improved (one paragraph per each thing you observe), and why it is a problem and/or how it can be improved. 

· Open questions: 1-2 high-level open questions you have got while reading the paper. Is there any question you are left with? Is there any question you would like to raise for discussion? Is there anything you are unclear of why they are doing ABC?

· New insights for you: 2-3 paragraphs of text on: what did you learn from this paper? How will it influence your future projects/research/thinking?

· When writing this, we strongly recommend you to make connections to your personal and professional experience in human-computer interaction. You can tell us: Why did you choose this paper to read? What do you particularly like about and why? Does this remind you of any past project you did or your personal experience of using certain applications? Is there anything in the paper that you want to try out for your project? Is there any new research you want to work on to address weaknesses you found?

Optional reading to help you understand HCI research:

Research contributions in human-computer interaction By Jacob O. Wobbrock and Julie A. Kientz In Interactions, Volume 23, Number 3, 2016