Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / How to Brief your Case Substance? Don’t use any abbreviation or term which you do not understand! ONE INCH MARGINS; Limited Indents; Do NOT INDENT deeply into the paper … FILENAME PROTOOCOL: brief number, your username followed by the word ‘brief’ and (followed by
How to Brief your Case
Substance? Don’t use any abbreviation or term which you do not understand!
ONE INCH MARGINS; Limited Indents; Do NOT INDENT deeply into the paper …
FILENAME PROTOOCOL: brief number, your username followed by the word ‘brief’ and (followed by .doc or .docx, etc., depending). For instance, my second brief would have the filename 2spaldingnbrief.docx. If you prefer, you may use your full first name; i.e., 2spaldingnancybrief.
Times New Roman 12 point; for lists of “questions” or “principles” use bullets, 1-2-3, or a-b-c; don’t run them together!,
Single space within paragraphs, a line between sections, as below:
Name or title of the Case (with date/court where pertinent)
[probably 2 lines, centered at top]
Limited Indents; Do NOT INDENT deeply into the paper …
Use ONE sentence per question; cases usually contain several questions
Follow this with a concise statement of the court’s reasoning in reaching this decision; use the finding’s logic
Note dissent that clarifies majority position or oversights
Most important rule(s) of law that the case illustrates/proves/refers to (bold)
Cite specific rules and general principles this decision illustrates; tax your creativity but remain logical
Use ONE sentence per principle
[if you mention a treaty, use date, and then put it in the bibliography, full cite; Chekhov’s rule of play writing: if you have a pistol lying on a table in the first act, you must use it in the third]
Show where this case fits in the study of International Law; play the publicist. For example, you cited general principle “X,” weigh this case’s impact on principle “X” and on principles the case seems to contradict. Has subsequent law built on this case? Was this case a turning point? Or has law gone another direction? Was this case the zenith of this principle? Is the case reliable now or is it “history”? Etc...
DO NOT use web addresses as citations.
Some Names of courts and abbreviations:
International Court of Justice [thereafter, ICJ]
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea [thereafter, Tribunal or ITLOS]
Some Frequently used treaties:
1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations [thereafter Convention (1961) or Vienna Convention (1961)]
1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations [thereafter Convention (1963)]
1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties [hereafter Treaty on Treaties (1969)]
1982 Law of the Sea Treaty (or Convention)
I will put up a discussion Q for you to enter the case you choose each time; I need to know in advance, so that I can organize the discussion.
To help you get the most from your briefs, please note the following: