Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Odwalla's managers consistently issued statements denying that they had any actual or constructive knowledge that Odwalla's processing systems were dangerous
Odwalla's managers consistently issued statements denying that they had any actual or constructive knowledge that Odwalla's processing systems were dangerous. Do any facts in the case study contradict those statements? Are these facts sufficient to establish the elements of criminal intent on the part of the executives who made the denials?
Yes, facts contradict the statement given by Odwalla's managers. Facts were that US army rejected the proposal of Odwalla because there were high levels of bacteria in the juices offered by the company. The inspector inspected this and then the US army rejected its proposal.
These facts provided by the US army are sufficient if the reliability of these facts is proved in the court. They will be charged for criminal intent on the part of executives because they knew that the juices are not healthy but didn't stop its production and continued to offer the product to the consumers. The management also didn't make any efforts to correct their mistakes. This is why the company will be held responsible for the contagious drinks offered by it and in an attempt to cause harm to the lives of the people.