Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee
Human-written only.
24/7 Support
Anytime, anywhere.
Plagiarism Free
100% Original.
Expert Tutors
Masters & PhDs.
100% Confidential
Your privacy matters.
On-Time Delivery
Never miss a deadline.
New York University - ECON 227 Urban Economics Spring 2013 Problem Set #3 Due Monday, Mar 11, 4pm Slip the Problem set under my office door, Econ Dept, 19 W 4th St, Rm 704 Do not put it into any boxes or mailboxes! Assume the utility functions for two cities are identical and are given by U=N - 0
New York University - ECON 227
|
|
|
|
Urban Economics Spring 2013
Problem Set #3
Due Monday, Mar 11, 4pm
Slip the Problem set under my office door, Econ Dept, 19 W 4th St, Rm 704 Do not put it into any boxes or mailboxes!
- Assume the utility functions for two cities are identical and are given by U=N - 0.1*N2, where N denotes the city’s population in million.
- What is each city’s utility maximizing population?
- If each city had a population of 6.5 million people, how would these cities change their size? Assuming that the total population of 13 million cannot be changed, would there be a smaller and a larger city? Would there be three or more cities? Or would there be no change at all. Explain.
- Correct or false? Do not explain
- The K=6 principle of the Central Place Theory is reflected in the hexagonal market form (“hexa” in Greek means 6).
- In the K=3 principle of the Central Place Theory suggests that each central place serves exactly its own market plus 3 markets of adjacent cities. (c) In the K=4 principle of the Central Place Theory suggests that each central place serves exactly its own market plus 3 markets of adjacent cities.
- Innovation and Growth:
Suppose a region’s workforce of 14 million is initially split equally between two cities, X and Y. The urban utility curve peaks at 4 million workers, and beyond that point the slope is constantly -$3 per million workers. The initial equilibrium utility is $60. Suppose city X experiences technological innovation that shifts its utility curve upward by $12.
-
- Draw a pair of utility curves, one for X and one for Y, and label the positions immediately after the innovation (before any migration) as x for city X and y for city Y. Use arrows along the curves to indicate that migration that follows. Show the long-run equilibrium using x’ and y’ respectively.
- For the new equilibrium (after migration) calculate the utility and the population in each city.
Expert Solution
|
|
|
|
Urban Economics Spring 2013
Problem Set #3
Due Monday, Mar 11, 4pm
Slip the Problem set under my office door, Econ Dept, 19 W 4th St, Rm 704 Do not put it into any boxes or mailboxes!
- Assume the utility functions for two cities are identical and are given by U=N - 0.1*N2, where N denotes the city’s population in million.
- What is each city’s utility maximizing population?
- If each city had a population of 6.5 million people, how would these cities change their size? Assuming that the total population of 13 million cannot be changed, would there be a smaller and a larger city? Would there be three or more cities? Or would there be no change at all. Explain.
-
- to find the utility-maximizing population calculate the derivative of U and set it equal to zero.
dU/dN=1-0.2N è N=5
-
- A population of 6.5m people is more the U-max population (downward sloping branch of U curve). Any point on the downward sloping part of the Ucurve is a stable equilibrium, i.e., leaving this point means losing. There would be no change.
- Correct or false? Do not explain
- The K=6 principle of the Central Place Theory is reflected in the hexagonal market form (“hexa” in Greek means 6). FALSE
- In the K=3 principle of the Central Place Theory suggests that each central place serves exactly its own market plus 3 markets of adjacent cities. FALSE (c) In the K=4 principle of the Central Place Theory suggests that each central place serves exactly its own market plus 3 markets of adjacent cities. CORRECT
- Innovation and Growth:
Suppose a region’s workforce of 14 million is initially split equally between two cities, X and Y. The urban utility curve peaks at 4 million workers, and beyond that point the slope is constantly -$3 per million workers. The initial equilibrium utility is $60. Suppose city X experiences technological innovation that shifts its utility curve upward by $12.
-
- Draw a pair of utility curves, one for X and one for Y, and label the positions immediately after the innovation (before any migration) as x for city X and y for city Y. Use arrows along the curves to indicate that migration that follows. Show the long-run equilibrium using x’ and y’ respectively.
- For the new equilibrium (after migration) calculate the utility and the population in each city.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
A city receives |
|
|
|
export income of $20,000. Its marginal propensity to consume |
|
locally is known to be 0.25. Calculate the total income change and the |
|
income |
|
multiplier if |
|
|
|
a) the income increase multiplies for 5 periods |
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|
c |
|
onsider the initi |
|
al exp |
|
ort income |
|
as period one) and |
|
|
|
( |
|
b) the income increase multiplies |
|
|
|
infinitely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
( |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
= |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
+ |
|
???? |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
+ |
|
???? |
|
???? |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
+ |
|
???????????? |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
+ |
|
???????????????? |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) |
|
( |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
= |
|
? |
|
???? |
|
∗ |
|
! |
|
! |
|
! |
|
! |
|
= |
|
|
|
? |
|
???? |
|
∗ |
|
! |
|
! |
|
. |
|
! |
|
" |
|
= |
|
26 |
|
, |
|
666 |
|
. |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archived Solution
You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.
For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.





