A)Is advertising inherently immoral, a way of wooing customers to buy something they do not need? Or, is there a morally justified reason for advertising?  B) What are two ethical issues that emerge when doing business in a global environment? How should businesspeople try to resolve these moral dilemmas?  C)One of the central arguments in Powell and Zwolinski concerns the moral permissibility of sweatshops

A)Is advertising inherently immoral, a way of wooing customers to buy something they do not need? Or, is there a morally justified reason for advertising?
 B) What are two ethical issues that emerge when doing business in a global environment? How should businesspeople try to resolve these moral dilemmas?
 C)One of the central arguments in Powell and Zwolinski concerns the moral permissibility of sweatshops. Their argument goes roughly as follows:
1. Sweatshop labor provides the best alternative available to workers. 
2. If sweatshop labor, the best possible alternative, is morally impermissible, then it will either be exploitative or coercive. 
3. Sweatshop labor is neither exploitative nor coercive. 
Therefore, sweatshop labor is morally permissible.
 
Critique this argument. State whether it is a good argument, i.e. it is sound or unsound. Identify the most controversial premise. If you think the argument is unsound, then argue against that premise; if you think the argument is sound, then respond on behalf of the authors and explain why the controversial premise is true.