Trusted by Students Everywhere
Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee

Human-written only.

24/7 Support

Anytime, anywhere.

Plagiarism Free

100% Original.

Expert Tutors

Masters & PhDs.

100% Confidential

Your privacy matters.

On-Time Delivery

Never miss a deadline.

Why individuals remain in subordinate situations (for example peripheral males at a lek or lowest tanking individual in a social group lie a wolf pack or lion pride) where they had limited access to important resources

Biology Oct 05, 2020

Why individuals remain in subordinate situations (for example peripheral males at a lek or lowest tanking individual in a social group lie a wolf pack or lion pride) where they had limited access to important resources. What is the general explanation for remaining?

Expert Solution

By remaining in a social group even at the lowest rung an individual still maintains the benefits of being in a social group. See https://notes.utk.edu/bio/greenberg.nsf/4716d8bcc3a1c35685256d280059759b/2da1f68f0e36978185256d2e005fc3ed?OpenDocument for a great chart of the advantages of sociality that include feeding, reproductive and antipreditorial advantages. There also exists the possibility of increasing ones rank within a hierarchy by death or displacement of members. Basically as long as an individual has a greater chance of success in the group than on their own they will remain.

Archived Solution
Unlocked Solution

You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.

Already a member? Sign In
Important Note: This solution is from our archive and has been purchased by others. Submitting it as-is may trigger plagiarism detection. Use it for reference only.

For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.

Or get 100% fresh solution
Get Custom Quote
Secure Payment