Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee
Human-written only.
24/7 Support
Anytime, anywhere.
Plagiarism Free
100% Original.
Expert Tutors
Masters & PhDs.
100% Confidential
Your privacy matters.
On-Time Delivery
Never miss a deadline.
Why individuals remain in subordinate situations (for example peripheral males at a lek or lowest tanking individual in a social group lie a wolf pack or lion pride) where they had limited access to important resources
Why individuals remain in subordinate situations (for example peripheral males at a lek or lowest tanking individual in a social group lie a wolf pack or lion pride) where they had limited access to important resources. What is the general explanation for remaining?
Expert Solution
By remaining in a social group even at the lowest rung an individual still maintains the benefits of being in a social group. See https://notes.utk.edu/bio/greenberg.nsf/4716d8bcc3a1c35685256d280059759b/2da1f68f0e36978185256d2e005fc3ed?OpenDocument for a great chart of the advantages of sociality that include feeding, reproductive and antipreditorial advantages. There also exists the possibility of increasing ones rank within a hierarchy by death or displacement of members. Basically as long as an individual has a greater chance of success in the group than on their own they will remain.
Archived Solution
You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.
For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.





