Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Scenario Two Problem Solution Paper and Presentation:   Develop a 2,500-3,000-word paper in which you do the following: Describe the situation, including the opportunities and challenges

Scenario Two Problem Solution Paper and Presentation:   Develop a 2,500-3,000-word paper in which you do the following: Describe the situation, including the opportunities and challenges

Business

    1. Scenario Two Problem Solution Paper and Presentation:

 

Develop a 2,500-3,000-word paper in which you do the following:

      1. Describe the situation, including the opportunities and challenges.
      2. Define the problem.
      3. Describe the desired future state and goals against which to evaluate alternatives.
      4. Identify two to four potential solutions.  At what level in the organization do these solutions address the problem?  Do you need to consider other levels in the organization as well?
      5. Assess the alternative solutions.
      6. Complete a risk assessment.
      7. Present the recommended solution and the rationale behind the recommendation.
      8. Identify the expected impact and value.
      9. Provide a summary of how you would approach implementing the recommended solution and measuring its effectiveness.

Be sure to incorporate key concepts from your readings where appropriate.

 

 

SCENARIO: RIORDAN MANUFACTURING

COMPANY OVERVIEW

 

Employee motivation is an issue that does not discriminate. Organizations of all sizes wrestle with it, and those who don’t are at a disadvantage, faced with lower job satisfaction and increased turnover. In the past ten years, several factors have developed that further complicate the issue. Organizational strategy factors, such as desire to increase innovation, recognize the value of teamwork, and reach new customers with new products have come into play. But simple things like how to equally reward and motivate employees with different needs also deserve consideration.

 

The latter is particularly true in manufacturing companies -- especially high-tech ones -- with a broad range of employees with myriad motivational needs. A typical manufacturing firm employs manual laborers, skilled trades, administrators, professionals, technical employees, sales and managerial staff. Usually, these workers represent multiple educational backgrounds, generations, ethnicities and family situations. How well the organization addresses these differences can mean the difference between an energized, productive workforce and a lethargic, non-productive one.

 

Riordan Manufacturing is a global plastics producer employing 550 people with projected annual earnings of $46 million. The company is wholly owned by Riordan Industries, a Fortune 1000 enterprise with revenues in excess of $1 billion. Production is divided among three plants: plastic beverage containers in Albany, Georgia; custom plastic parts in Pontiac, Michigan; and plastic fan parts in Hangzhou, China. Research and Development is conducted at corporate headquarters in San Jose, California. Riordan's major customers are automotive parts manufacturers, aircraft manufacturers, the Department of Defense, beverage makers and bottlers, and appliance manufacturers.

 

Recently, Riordan made several strategic changes in the way it manufactures and markets its products. Declining sales and uneven profits over the past two years not only forced the company to change its sales processes, but prompted them to adopt a customer-relationship management (CRM) system. Customers are now serviced primarily by sales teams rather than single salespeople, with each team focusing on a particular customer segment. Teams typically include a sales person, product engineering specialist and customer service rep. The hope is that the team approach will improve sales.

 

From a manufacturing perspective, Riordan has implemented a Six Sigma quality approach and is ISO9000 certified. Some work has been redirected to a new manufacturing facility in China, and plants have been restructured into self-directed work teams. Unfortunately, as changes have been implemented, employee retention numbers have declined. The company recently conducted an annual employee survey, which showed a decrease in overall job satisfaction, particularly in the areas of compensation and benefits.

 

Riordan’s employees comprise three major demographic groups. Baby boomers make up the bulk of the managerial and about half of the manufacturing staff; GenXers make up the majority of the professional staff, as well as some of the manufacturing staff; and the GenY contingent are the newest hires, found primarily in manufacturing, engineering and IT. These three groups have radically different perspectives on rewards and motivation, valuing everything from interesting work to bigger paychecks.

 

Recent performance data identified about 25 percent of the employees as high achievers, a large group of mid-tier performers and a small group of people who are not performing well at all. Unfortunately, the current reward system is barely based on performance, instead recognizing cost-of-living increases, seniority and position. Faced with declining morale and work ethic, Riordan managers have been pressuring the CEO to "do something" about the rewards system.

 

Sales management wants an improved commission structure that recognizes the new teamwork philosophy, while salespeople fear their bonuses could be at risk if they depend on team, and not individual, performance. Other managers are concerned that, with or without incentives, their employee base salaries are too low to retain good people and are urging the CEO to increase pay levels. Engineering and IT managers are particularly concerned that several employees with proprietary information may leave the organization for greener pastures. Research and Development says that their employees who work on long-term projects would be best served by incentives that reward continued focus. They also want their contributions to the sales process to be recognized and acknowledged.

 

The CEO knows that something must be done, and he’s considering his options: Completely overhaul the reward system, use piecemeal solutions to address the most critical issue or find new motivation strategies. Costs, of course, have to be carefully weighed against any benefits, especially because some of the company's key customers are extremely price sensitive.

 

 

THE PLAYERS

 

Michael Riordan: Riordan Manufacturing's 60-year-old founder, President, Chief Executive and with 80 percent of the company’s stock, primary shareholder. Michael firmly believes that the company takes good care of its employees and that employee loyalty would go a long way toward solving the company’s motivation problems. He is also increasingly concerned about the value of his investment as he nears retirement age.

 

Kenneth Collins: Riordan's Senior Vice President of Research and Development. Michael‘s former college roommate, Kenneth has been with Riordan since the very beginning.  A brilliant technician, Kenneth has led R&D  to develop several innovative products, and is now very worried that he might lose key researchers because of inadequate compensation. Kenneth gets along well with the sales group, but is not well-liked by the manufacturing team.

 

Hugh McCauley: Riordan's Chief Operating Officer. After a long career in the automotive industry, Hugh came to Riordan six years ago. As an engineer, he believes that most motivation issues are the result of poorly designed processes. Rather than focusing on compensation, he believes the organization should improve job design.

 

Charles Lacy: Riordan's Vice President of Sales & Marketing. Charles has been with Riordan for 10 years, but just one in his current position. He is credited with the changes in the sales process, including team sales, and is a strong advocate for compensating employees based on team performance.

 

Maria Trinh: Riordan's Chief Information Officer. Maria is the newest senior employee, having joined Riordan just two years ago. She is very concerned about losing key staff members because of inadequate compensation, particularly because they are in the midst of a major system redesign. To prevent this, she would like to see compensation levels adjusted for IT professionals.

 

Yvonne McMillan: Riordan's Director of Human Resources. In the 10 years she‘s been at Riordan, Yvonne has been unable to secure HR a more active and strategic role in the organization. Frustrated by her lack of success, Yvonne often complains that she’s treated as nothing more than a personnel manager. She conducts the annual employee survey, but has never seen any changes implemented because of the survey results, and doubts very much she ever will.

 

Dale Edgel: Riordan's Chief Financial Officer. Before coming to Riordan five years ago, Dale held various tax and general management positions in manufacturing and pharmaceutical organizations. Dale oversees all HR activities at Riordan, and believes that the current compensation systems are adequate.

 

Barbara Masterson: Human Capital Consulting's Senior Consultant. Riordan retained Barbara to review the current compensation system and suggest changes. Barbara has experience working with several high-tech organizations, and has used that -- as well as the employee survey results -- as the basis for her recommendations.

 

MAY 10, 2005

 

To: Dale Edgel

From: Charles Lacy

Re: New Sales Incentive Plan

Confidential

 

Dale,

 

We need to revamp the sales incentive system as soon as possible. With the new strategy to create customer-focused teams, we can't continue to pay sales people on an individual basis. Can we get someone going on this right away?

 

Charles

 

 

 

MAY 15, 2005

 

To: Dale Edgel

From: Kenneth Collins

Re: Employee Turnover

Confidential

 

Dale,

 

I’m really concerned about the turnover levels in R&D. Over the past three months, I’ve lost three key people, and it looks like I could easily lose more if the increasing number of complaints about compensation and decreased satisfaction are any indication. In exit interviews, I’m hearing that they’re not being challenged, that they can make a lot more money elsewhere, and that our incentives are weak. We need to watch out; the headhunters are circling...

 

My biggest concern is that we have three major product introductions coming up next year. If I lose the key engineers on these projects, we’ll have a tough time meeting those introduction deadlines. We need to create an incentive plan for key engineers that is tied to completing these projects and introducing the new products on time. How soon can we make this happen?

 

Kenneth

 

 

 

MAY 22, 2005

 

To: Dale Edgel

From: Maria Trinh

Re: Employee Turnover

Confidential

 

Dale,

 

Over the past several weeks, I’ve been reviewing salary surveys. If you can trust what I’ve found on-line, we are seriously underpaying our key programmers. With several major redesign projects in the works, I think you’ll agree that we can’t afford to lose our key programmers now. From what I’ve seen, the rest of the organization is paid competitively, but we’re off in this area by about 15 percent average. Can we fix this and if so, how soon?

 

Maria

 

 

 

JUNE 1, 2005

 

MEMO TO: Michael Riordan

FROM: Dale Edgel

Re: Employee Survey Results

Confidential

 

Michael,

 

As you know, we recently completed the annual employee satisfaction survey. I've attached a summary detailing the key findings, as well as the scores on each of the questions asked. My initial reaction to these survey results is extreme concern; these trends aren’t something we can ignore.

 

Even without this, I’ve been getting a lot of pressure from Kenneth to do something about the morale in R&D, as he’s afraid he’s going to lose some critical people at a time when he can least afford to lose them (as if there’s ever a good time to lose good people). Charles has been fretting about the switch to customer-focused teams and how that affects individual incentive programs.  Maria has lost three people in the past 12 months and tells me that our entire information infrastructure is at risk if something doesn’t change. I’ve attached e-mails from each of them that should fill in some of the blanks.

 

What makes this even more alarming is that, historically, our employee turnover rates have been below the industry average. In the past 12 months, even though we’re still doing better than the industry as a whole, our turnover rates are up (as you can see in the attached retention report). I just don’t want this to be the beginning of a trend that could really hurt our success.

 

Because I don’t feel we should waste any time, I took the liberty of having Yvonne prepare an analysis of employee complaints over the past 12 months. It shows a disturbing increase in complaints in a number of key areas.

 

Michael, I really think we need to pull the leadership team together to discuss these trends and decide what to do. Let’s talk at your earliest convenience.  Until then, please review the 2003/2004 Employee Satisfaction Survey, Turnover Report, and the Summary of Employee Complaints compiled by Yvonne McMillan. This information is available under the Reports and Communications tabs in Riordan’s Intranet by clicking on Human Resources.

 

Thanks,

Dale

 

 

June 7, 2005

 

MEMO TO: Leadership Team

FROM: Michael Riordan

Re: Minutes of Meeting

Confidential

 

Thank you all for attending today’s meetings. Just so I know we’re all on the same page, I had my assistant prepare a summary of key points that came up throughout our discussion. If you feel you‘ve been misinterpreted, please e-mail me.

  • Charles does not believe we have much time. Sales are continuing to decline, as they have for the past two years, and the switch to customer-focused teams is proceeding slowly. He would like us to consider revamping the sales incentive system.
  • Kenneth would like to add incentives for R&D staff, with focus on both new product introductions and sales. His rationale is that R&D staff are now expected to support the customer sales teams, so they should earn incentives when those sales are completed.
  • Maria believes that IT staff is underpaid relative to the competition and suggests adjusting salary ranges for IT as soon as possible.
  • Hugh is concerned about doing anything differently with compensation, as income before tax continues to drop as a percentage of sales.
  • Dale believes that job satisfaction issues are more complex than just compensation and benefits and doesn't believe creating new incentives or adjusting pay rates will solve the underlying problems.

 

After considering all of your input, I find myself unwilling to move forward with changes in the compensation system at this time. Instead, I’ve asked Dale to hire an HR consultant to help us analyze the issues raised in the employee survey. We will not take further action until we have the results of that analysis.

 

I expect each of you to cooperate fully in this project. Time is short. Let's move quickly.

 

Michael

 

 

JUNE 7, 2005

 

To: Dale Edgel

From: Hugh McCauley

 

Dale,

 

Please move quickly to find a consultant to help us on these job satisfaction issues. I know Yvonne is competent, but I don't think she’s objective about this project. I've talked with Michael and we have allocated $50,000 for the study. Let me know if you need more information.

 

Hugh

 

JUNE 7, 2005

 

To: Hugh McCauley

From: Dale Edgel

 

I‘m on it, Hugh. Yvonne has already identified three possible firms and I’m interviewing them tomorrow. I should have a recommendation for you by the end of the week, and I will keep your comments (re: Yvonne) in mind.

 

By the way, I'm concerned that Charles and Kenneth are too sure that throwing more money at the employees will solve all our problems. I don‘t think it‘s that simple. I wouldn‘t be surprised to see that we need more changes in leadership, employee development and job design. I‘d like your support and help in preparing everyone for this possibility.

 

Dale

 

JUNE 8, 2005

 

To: Charles Lacy

From: Kenneth Collins

 

Charles,

 

We need to keep pushing this incentive issue. I know my staff really wants to support the sales team, but I'm concerned that they’ll become even more discouraged if they continue to see all the rewards going to the sales folks, even though they're contributing a lot to the sale. I need your support on this.

 

Kenneth

 

JUNE 8, 2005

 

To: Yvonne McMillan

From: Maria Trinh

 

 

Yvonne,

 

Can you please conduct a salary survey for me on the following IT positions: Network administrator, programmer/analyst, and database analyst? I need more data to show Hugh in order to convince him that we need to adjust salary ranges.

 

Thanks,

Maria

 

 

JUNE 9, 2005

 

To: Dale Edgel

From: Yvonne McMillan

 

Dale,

 

I’ve got meetings set up for tomorrow with each of the three consultant finalists. As I understand it, the scope of the work is to further define the issues identified in the employee survey and to recommend potential solutions. Is there anything else I should prepare for the meeting?

 

Yvonne

 

JUNE 9, 2005

 

To: Dale Edgel

From: Kenneth Collins

 

Dale,

 

I'd like to sit in on the consultant interviews. I want to make sure the firm hired understands the importance of R&D to the company. What time and where are the meetings?

 

Kenneth

 

JUNE 9, 2005

 

To: Kenneth Collins

From: Dale Edgel

 

Kenneth,

 

I don't really think that's a very good idea. Let's keep things neutral for now and not try to influence the outcome.

 

Dale

 

JUNE  9, 2005

 

To: Yvonne McMillan

From: Dale Edgel

 

Yvonne,

 

Thanks for setting up the meetings. See you there. Oh, don’t forget to order the coffee and danish!

 

Dale

 

JUNE 11, 2005

 

To: Yvonne McMillan

From: Dale Edgel

 

Yvonne,

 

I was really disappointed in the position you took in the consultant interviews yesterday. The idea is to have the consultant identify the problems we’re having, not spell them out as if we already know what they are. Because in case you aren’t clear on this, we don’t. I’m sorry to have to say this, but I don’t think you have the objectivity necessary to lead this project, and I’ll let Michael know that I’m taking over, but will bring you in as necessary.

 

Dale

 

 

JUNE 14, 2005

 

MEMO TO: Michael Riordan

CC: Hugh McCauley

FROM: Dale Edgel

Re: Consultant Hired

Confidential

 

Michael,

 

I’d like Human Capital Consulting from Santa Clara to conduct the analysis we discussed. One of the firm’s principals, Barbara Masterson, has agreed to lead the study. The analysis objectives are: 1) Identify the underlying issues that are leading to decreased employee satisfaction and 2) Recommend potential courses of action to address those issues.

 

I don’t believe that Yvonne has the objectivity needed for this project, so I’ve asked Barbara to report directly to me. Make no mistake: I think Yvonne should be able to handle this, but right now, I don’t have time to deal with that issue.

 

What kind of communication do we want to send out to the organization?

 

Dale

 

 

INTERVIEW NOTES: Barbara Masterson

JUNE, 21, 2005:  Interview with Kenneth Collins

 

  • Collins is clearly very concerned about key researchers, afraid they’ll leave for higher salaries. When pressed, he couldn't name anyone who has left for a higher salary, and couldn't identify specific individuals who might leave. States it's more of a "gut feeling" than actual data.
  • Also concerned that the new requirement for R&D folks to support sales teams is pulling them away from the longer-term R&D projects. Cites concerns that incentives aren’t strong enough to keep people focused on long-term projects that don't have immediate results.
  • Thinks that Maria is overstating the problem with IT professionals. States that in his experience, these people are being paid just fine, but that they are not being recognized for the contributions they make.

 

JUNE 21, 2005:  Interview with Hugh McCauley

 

  • Thinks that the issues facing the company have little to do with compensation. Wants to see more attention on redesigning jobs to make them more interesting. Says that worked well in the auto industry and there's no reason it shouldn't work here.
  • Very opinionated.
  • Is concerned that everyone seems to be focused on issues at headquarters (sales, R&D, IT) without looking at the issues in Pontiac and Albany. Things are actually worse there, especially in terms of turnover and complaints. Would like to make sure this isn't overlooked in the overall study.
  • Thinks Riordan should take lessons from automotive industry; there's much to learn. (Likes to talk about his background before he came to Riordan.)
  • Doesn't really know if Yvonne is the right person for HR and would like my assessment on her capabilities (on the Q.T.)
  •  

JUNE, 22 2005: Interview with Charles Lacy

 

  • Shared changes happening in sales force, particularly as they relate to moving towards team-based sales. Is concerned that the sales force doesn’t “get it,” and isn’t sure what to do about that.
  • Knows that his desire to modify the incentive system is not supported, but believes it's the only way to get the point across that there is on turning back on this strategy.

 

JUNE 22, 2005: Interview with Maria Trinh

  • Thinks the entire future of the company revolves around the information infrastructure. Seems quite myopic about this.
  • Compares her IT staff to other companies where IT is the strategic focus, and may not understand the "staff" nature of the role at Riordan Manufacturing.
  • Would like to put stock options in place like other high-tech companies have done (Note to self: Are stock options a possibility for this company?).
  • Very concerned that she is going to lose some of her best employees because they believe they are underpaid. Named three people who have confided they‘ve been approached by headhunters in the past two months. Has been able to talk them into staying, but is concerned that this shows a trend.

 

 

JUNE 23, 2005: Interview with Michael Riordan

  • This guy is sharp, understands the issues facing the company pretty clearly.
  • Believes the company is "good to employees" and is concerned that they are no longer as loyal as they used to be.
  • Thinks that the new generation is just ungrateful and doesn't realize how good they have it. May be a bit unrealistic????

 

 

JUNE 25, 2005: Interview with Yvonne McMillan

 

  • Doesn't seem to be as concerned about employee morale as she is about HR's role in the company.
  • Believes she should report to Riordan directly and thinks most of the problems in the company are a result of HR being relegated to finance.
  • Says Dale doesn't appreciate the value of HR.
  • Also says there are many HR systems that are not supportive of where the leadership team claims it wants to go.

Examples:

*No relocation money available for internal transfers

*No employee development money available unless directly related to current job

*No succession planning in place

*Most managerial hires come from outside the company

*Job grievance process is cumbersome

*Training is sporadic

*Incentive plans reward individuals, but not teams

  • Believes she has little influence, thinks it is a gender issue as she and Maria are the only two executive level women. According to her, the executive team doesn't take either one of them seriously.
  • Thinks that the entire system needs to be overhauled and is hoping I can help to make that point.

 

 

July 9, 2005

Presentation from Human Capital to Riordan

Consultant Report - Power Point Presentation - Employee Satisfaction Audit.ppt

1) Agenda

  • Study Objectives
  • Process
  • Findings
  • Leadership Team Findings
  • Focus Groups
  • Survey Analysis
  • Findings
  • Benchmark Study
  • Recommendations

 

2) Study Objectives

  • Identify issues leading to employee dissatisfaction at Riordan Manufacturing
  • Recommend possible courses of action

 

3) Process

  • Leadership team interviews
  • Focus groups
  • Two in San Jose
  • Two in Pontiac
  • One in Albany (smaller work force)
  • Analysis of employee survey comments

 

4) Findings

  • Reward system is seriously flawed
  • HR systems in general are inadequate

 

5) Leadership Team Findings

  • Lack of agreement about primary issues
  • Primarily focused on changing reward systems
  • Need for consistency across functions

 

6) Focus Groups—What’s Working?

  • Majority of employees believe the overall package is “good”
  • Vacation package is fair
  • Supervisors treat people well
  • Good culture for innovation
  • Many long-term employees

 

7) Focus Groups—What’s Not Working?

  • Pay is tied to seniority more than performance
  • Performance reviews don’t always happen
  • Few opportunities for training or advancement
  • Managers play favorites
  • No clear understanding of how pay works
  • Not enough recognition of good performance
  • Promotions (when they happen) are based on politics
  • Newcomers are paid more than internal promotions—it’s better to leave and come back
  • Rewards are not connected to company strategy
  • System is secretive
  • Pay seems to be below market in some cases

 

8) Focus Groups—What People Want

  • Feel valued
  • Career information and opportunities
  • Effective coaching and feedback
  • Know how to contribute
  • Development opportunities

 

9) Survey Analysis

  • Employees are less satisfied in most areas
  • Critical areas
  • Overall job satisfaction (25% decline)
  • Working conditions (29% decline)
  • Personal opportunity (25% decline)
  • Compensation/benefits (26% decline)
  • Employee comments shed some light

 

10) Survey Analysis—Employee Comments

  • Representative Comments
  • “There’s no place for me to go here. I am actively looking for another job because I can’t get promoted here.”
  • “I can make a lot more money elsewhere—and I would be more appreciated.”
  • “This company requires all of me. There’s nothing left for my family.”
  • “No one seems to care about my career development. I haven’t had the opportunity to go to a workshop in two years.”
  • “I am actively looking for another job where the opportunity for advancement is better defined.”
  • “There is little recognition for great performance or an extra effort. I know I can get a raise just keeping my head low and following company rules.”

 

 

11) Benchmark Study—14 High-Tech Firms

  • Creative use of job design to retain key employees
  • Rewards are specifically tailored to individual performance
  • Extensive career development programs, mentoring programs in place
  • Most have formal succession plans
  • Most offer flexible working hours and telecommuting options to employees
  • Most offer child care and elder care benefits
  • More than half offer on-site personal services
  • Most have generous tuition reimbursement programs
  • Many offer stock options or grants to key employees

 

12) Recommendations

  • Additional research would be useful
  • Redesign reward process
  • Not a piecemeal approach
  • Should be a complete overhaul
  • Review other HR systems

Act quickly

 

JULY 9, 2005

 

Dale Edgel

Riordan Manufacturing

One Riordan Plaza

San Jose, CA 95112

 

Dear Dale,

 

We are pleased to submit a proposal to redesign Riordan Manufacturing’s compensation and reward system. As you requested, we’ve divided this proposal into several sections. We strongly believe that it is best to implement all of the recommendations we make; however, we recognize you may have reasons for choosing not to do everything at once. As such, we have presented our recommendations in what we believe is priority order.

 

1. Conduct a salary survey for all company positions that will determine current market positioning. Adjust salary grades based upon results.

          a. Time frame: 3 months

          b. Investment: $25,000

          c. Outcome: Clearly defined salary grades that will position Riordan Manufacturing competitively in the marketplace

          d. Company Resources: 50% time commitment for Terri Carranza. 25% time commitment for Yvonne McMillan

2. Develop incentive systems for Sales and R&D based upon change in corporate sales strategy.

          a. Time frame: 6 months

          b. Investment: $50,000

          c. Outcome: Recommendations for incentive plan, communications and education strategy for implementation, measurement system.

          d. Company Resources: 50% time commitment for Yvonne McMillan, 10% time      commitment from Charles Lacy. Access to directors of sales for each line of business.    Access to sales representatives for focus group purposes.

3. Develop performance appraisal process to ensure clearer alignment between business strategy and employee rewards.

          a. Time frame: 12 months

          b. Investment: $100,000

          c. Outcome: Aligned performance system that supports business strategy and clearly identifies performance expectations.

          d. Company resources: 25% time commitment for Yvonne McMillan, other HR support as identified by Riordan.

 

We look forward to the opportunity to partner with Riordan in the redesign of its reward system.

 

Sincerely,

Barbara Masterson

Barbara Masterson, Principal

Human Capital Consulting

 

 

July 9, 2005

 

MEMO TO: Leadership Team

FROM: Michael Riordan

RE: Minutes of Meeting

CONFIDENTIAL

 

I‘m glad you were able to hear the presentation from Barbara Masterson of Human Capital Consulting, and I thank you for your thoughtful discussion of the pros and cons of hiring her firm. My assistant has prepared this summary of our meeting:

 

Advantages of moving forward

  •  Shows employees we listened to their feedback and are committed to improvement.
  •  Potential to align rewards and strategy more effectively.
  •  Improves competitive position in San Jose market.
  •  

Disadvantages of moving forward

  • Cost: We are in the middle of a sales slump. Is this the right time to incur these kinds of costs? What are the benefits?
  • Doesn't address other areas identified in the employee survey, such as job design.
  • Requires almost full-time attention from key HR staff. Is this the best use of their time?
  • Does not address retention issues in Pontiac and Albany.
  • Could disrupt employee attention and create additional morale issues.

 

Certainly, there are other advantages and disadvantages. I am asking each of you to consider Barbara's recommendations over the weekend. We will meet again on Monday afternoon with an eye toward making a decision about whether -- and how -- to proceed.

 

Michael

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

please see the attached file.

The challenges of today's global business arena are legion. Much like emergency room doctors, effective managers must carefully, yet quickly and accurately analyze each situation, diagnose the correct problem and proceed to apply the correct solution. In this fast-paced, challenge wrought environment managers and the business organizations under their leadership have to make critical decisions on a routine basis. Making the correct decisions is essential to the survival of these operations, much in the same way that the survival of an emergency room patient depends on the correct diagnosis and treatment of an emergency room trauma. Just as emergency room doctors are successful in making correct diagnoses only when they follow a step-by-step diagnosis model, business managers can only identify the correct problems to solve, among the many they may face when they use the 9-step problem-solving model in correct order. Progressing in the correct order through the model will effectively guide managers toward identifying the correct problem, the most suitable available alternatives, and will ultimately help them in the implementation or execution of solutions. In the 9-step model begins this process by first describing the situation the at hand. A case in point is a complex business challenge at Riordan Manufacturing.

This paper will analyze the situation, opportunities and challenges of Riordan Manufacturing identifying the underlying problems with Riordan's human capital management using the 9-step problem solving model. The end-state goals and the proposed alternatives will help Riordan Manufacturing to improve human resource practices, giving Riordan a sustained competitive advantage (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001).

Situation Analysis (Step 1)
Riordan Manufacturing is an international plastics manufacturer with 550 employees and $46 million in projected annual revenues. Recently, Riordan made several strategic changes in the way it manufactures and markets its products. Declining sales and uneven profits over the past two years not only forced the company to change its sales approach but also prompted it to adopt a customer-relationship management (CRM) system. Sales teams rather than single salespeople now service customers with each team focusing on a particular customer segment. Teams typically include a sales person, product engineering specialist and customer service rep. The plan is that the team approach will improve sales (UOPOa, 2006).
Riordan Manufacturing has seen a consistent drop in employee satisfaction over the last 12 months and the increase of voluntary separations has doubled in the past year in every department. These numbers are alarming and speak of issues that could lead to disaster for Riordan if they are not recognized and quickly addressed.

Situation Analysis (Step 1)
Issue Identification
The first issue at hand is employee retention. It is evident that employees are leaving for higher pay. It is possible that Riordan is paying under the market average for these positions. This is a major concern for the research and development area in saving vital employee knowledge.

Secondly, the employee incentive program is an issue not only for management but also for the current employees. The sales incentives are structured for an individual salesperson rather than for a team. This issue has come about as a result of the change in the sales approach from individual accounts to a team approach incorporating a sales person, a product engineering specialist, and a customer service representative with support from research and development (UOPOa, 2006). The sales process has changed but the incentive/bonus process has not aligned itself to the change.

Another issue for Riordan is employee development and training. Riordan has done little to promote the training or development of its employees in recent years, an approach that would be a strategic advantage for the company. Training and development not only helps to attract top performers but will also provide incentive for retention (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001).
The human resources department reports to the finance department with no direct influence with the CEO, making it inefficient. Riordan needs a superior human resource management system to gain strategic advantage in human capital management (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001).

Finally employee satisfaction has dropped dramatically in the past year. This is because of employees' not feeling challenged, lack of appreciation, and lack of direction tied to the company's goals. Satisfied employees will promote a positive organizational climate and lead to increased productivity for Riordan (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001).

Opportunity Identification
Internally, each of these challenges present opportunities for learning and development. The company can evaluate current employees and determine their effectiveness in the new sales management system. The change process also provides opportunities for the management team to develop expertise in the areas of morale improvement, addressing and resolving employee dissatisfaction, and positive conflict management. The team approach to sales will provide opportunities for employees to collaborate and bring more complete customer solutions to the table.

Another opportunity is the indication that twenty-five percent of employees are high achievers. The company also has a large group of mid-tier performers who can be developed into high performers through training. Many of the employees like their jobs, are loyal, and want to stay with Riordan. Riordan has a reputation for treating employees well and the company is ISO9000 certified and practices the Six Sigma quality approach.

Further, Riordan has diversified product offerings and a diversified customer. New business opportunities exist in meeting the new needs of these customers.
Table 1
Issue and Opportunity Identification
Issue Opportunity Reference to Specific
Course Concept
(Include citation) Concept
Employee Retention
Riordan can learn better retention practices for the future including designing more effective compensations packages
According to the American Society for Training and Development (ASTD), retention is the number one issue facing corporate America today. Adding to the problem is the cost of attrition (Stone, 2000).
Effective Compensation Packages
Employee Incentive Program Riordan can use a strategically aligned incentive program to motivate to encourage employees to stay. Good HR practices include establishing a variety of incentives oriented toward a long-term organizational focus (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001). Incentive Programs as a Tool of Motivation
Employee Development and Training Riordan can use measurable training as a basis for merit raises that motivate current employees and will attract top performers. Training and development not only helps to attract top performers but will also provide incentive for retention (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001).
Successful Recruiting Practices, Motivation
Lack of an Effective Human Resources Department Riordan's management team must align its goals with the company's HR department. HR practices must be integrated and aligned closely, so that they reinforce each other and encourage behaviors that are compatible with organizational goals (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001). Motivation
Employee Satisfaction Riordan must keep its employees satisfied to retain them. Satisfied employees will promote a positive organizational climate and lead to increased productivity for Riordan (Dreher & Dougherty, 2001). Motivation

Stakeholder Perspectives/Ethical Dilemmas
There are several stakeholders to consider when looking at the current situation at Riordan Manufacturing and it starts with the investors of Riordan Industries who have seen investments declining over the past two years. From their perspective, Michael Riordan should be looking for a way to strengthen the company and turn profits around as quickly as possible so as not to lose more shareholders. Ethically, Riordan owes the shareholders a good return on their investment and must find a way to improve the current sales slump even if it means moving more of the manufacturing to the Hangzhou, China plant (UOPOa, 2006).
Another group of stakeholder is the customers, current, past, and new and how they perceive the changes within Riordan. The customers want to purchase a top quality product at a competitive price from a sound company they can trust. Riordan's responsibility is to make sure these customers are satisfied. The company must not be distracted by its internal issues, which can detract from the level of quality and service they rendered customers in the past.
The next set of stakeholders is the employees. A recent employee satisfaction survey shows a decline in employee job satisfaction and the senior management team cannot agree on the course of action that needs to be taken. The department heads are more concerned about their own employees and not the overall issue facing the company and the issue of what is best for all employees. There are issues with how the new customer-focused team approach to selling affects the morale of those involved with it and how it will change each person's role within the company. As these changes have been implemented along with moving more of the manufacturing to China, Riordan has seen a decline in employee retention (UOPOa, 2006).
Ethically Riordan must consider the changes it is implementing and decide what are the best solutions overall to satisfy all stakeholders and do not compromise the integrity of the company which has been the backbone of Riordan since its inception.
Table 2
Stakeholder Perspectives
Stakeholder Perspectives

Stakeholder Groups
The Interests, Rights, and
Values of Each Group

Riordan's Investors They expect a good return on their investment and want Riordan to find a way to improve the current sales slump even if it means moving more of the manufacturing to the Hangzhou, China plant.
Riordan's Customers They want to purchase a top quality product at a competitive price from a sound company they can trust.
Riordan's Employees They are dissatisfied with their jobs and fear they may lose their jobs if the company shifts most manufacturing to Hangzhou, China.

Problem Statement (Step 2)
Formulation of a problem statement for Riordan Manufacturing will help lead the management team to find solutions and opportunities for the future. Riordan Manufacturing needs to remain a successful global plastics producer. The company also needs to build and retain a loyal and productive workforce that will provide stability and success for its future. An appropriate problem statement for the company would be: Riordan Manufacturing will remain a successful global plastics producer by building and retaining an energized and productive workforce.
End-State Vision (Step 3)
Riordan Manufacturing must work toward developing and retaining an energized and productive workforce and the first goal to achieve to that end is to increase overall job satisfaction among employees. The most recent employee survey shows a steady decline in overall satisfaction from 4.2 in 2001/2002 to the current average score of 3.1. A strategic goal for Riordan would be to increase and maintain an average overall satisfaction score greater than 4.0.
Another goal for Riordan would be to provide and maintain a compensation and benefits package that would attract and retain top performers. The overall satisfaction rating of the pay and benefits at Riordan Manufacturing for 2003/2004 was 2.5. Although this score was highest at 3.4, to achieve maximum advantage in human capital Riordan should attempt to lead competitors in the industry with a rating equal to or greater than 4.0. Implementing bonuses and incentives for job performance will provide the most gain in satisfaction along with increased feedback regarding job performance is likely to yield good results.
Finally Riordan must work to retain current employees. Employee retention has also steadily declined since 2001.The area most alarming is the voluntary separations, which is turnover that a company has not initiated (Noe et al, 2004). For Riordan this rate has increased more than 50% over the past two years. A strategically aligned goal for Riordan would be to decrease and maintain the consolidated voluntary separation rate less than 4%. This would lead to a decrease in the overall consolidated turnover rate.
Alternative Solutions and Benchmarking (Step 4)
Research into companies who have had success with similar issues will provide valuable alternatives for Riordan to consider. This paper makes use of benchmarking research on the topics of employee motivation and performance, employee retention and career development, employee rewards and compensation, and alignment of HR strategies with organizational goals. The research includes and analyzes several companies to provide the widest possible perspective and alternative solutions for Riordan.
Employee motivation is a critical issue for every company. Employees are motivated to action or performance by different things at different times in different situations. Managers must be able to motivate and lead their employees effectively through all these variables, and the issue then becomes what method to use.
The factor that determines if employees choose to pursue desired performance over undesired performance is whether management increases the net reward for desired performance, as employees perceive it. This means that management must maximize what workers like about the desired performance so that it outweighs what workers do not like about it (Correll, 2004). This of course differs from situation to situation, as illustrated through the following two cases demonstrate different yet equally effective approaches to employee motivation and performance.
Connextions is a provider of outsourced call-center and fulfillment services. One way Connextions increased performance and motivation of its employees was to implement a management benchmarking program. This program recognizes high-potential employees and mentors them and they are guided through individualized career-development programs after proving themselves as top salespeople. This is unusual for the call center industry, as only 38% of call centers offer a formal skill path for their employees, according to a survey by the Incoming Calls Management Institute (ICMI), a call-center consulting and research firm based in Annapolis, Maryland. The formal programs are not all that motivate and get top performance from people in the call center business or any other, it is about providing coaching, direction, and feedback, and it is about not letting employees become just another number (VNU Business Media, 2006).
Riordan can motivate its employees by taking lessons from the Connextions example above. Riordan can easily maximize employee satisfaction with the desired performance, staying at Riordan, through showing its especially outstanding employees appreciation and recognition providing them with the opportunity to advance and succeed within the company. Riordan must regularly evaluate the performance of its employees recognizing the star performers and providing them with individualized training programs that encourage them to stay with and advance within the company or risk the continued wave of unsatisfied employees leaving the company.
Alberto-Culver is a manufacturer and marketer of personal-care, specialty groceries and household products. Seven years ago its rate of employee turnover was twice the industry average. Since then the company has cut that average in half. The firm developed a list of 10 cultural imperatives: honesty, ownership, trust, customer orientation, commitment, fun, innovation, risk taking, speed and urgency, and teamwork. Alberto-Culver also established growth-development leaders to mentor for future growth. Formally a closed-off company became an open and communicating company. The company also started recognizing important achievements and did so throughout the entire company (Human Resource Management International Digest, 2002)
Riordan can use many of the same principles that Alberto-Culver incorporated into its organization. This may mean initiating a fundamental culture change throughout the company and establishing a mentor program to develop the next generation of management according to the new company culture. This along with rewarding and celebrating both small and large successes within the company can minimize the negative aspects and increase the net reward of the desired performance, again staying at Riordan and allowing the company to retain its human capital.
Employee retention is the most critical issue facing corporate leaders because of the shortage of skilled labor; economic growth and employee turnover. Supervisors must take responsibility for employee retention. A wise employer will learn how to attract and keep good employees, because in the end, this workforce will determine a company's success or failure. Employee retention requires being sensitive to people's needs and at the same time aligning these needs with the organization's strategic needs. Career development is important to employee retention as it can reduce costs due to employee turnover thus aligning employee training needs with the organizational need to save money as demonstrated through the Qualcomm example.
With a 4% turnover rate, Qualcomm has set itself apart as the industry leader in employee retention. As an entrepreneurial company populated by academics, mathematicians and scientists with advanced degrees, Qualcomm staunchly preserves a culture that is fluid, innovative, flexible, independent, and un-bureaucratic. The closest thing they have listed to a dress code is no shoes should have ears. This came from someone wearing bunny slippers to work. One of their main reasons for having such a high retention rate is their education development. They have established a Learning Center with 30 employees dedicated to the development and education of the company. The center does not teach the classes itself but is a source which will find and set-up classes by outsourcing the work to a professional that is a leading source of information in that field (A Story to Tell, 2005).
Riordan can likewise learn to harness and develop its own workforce to be an added value to the company through providing continuous learning for its employees. Continuous learning can in turn be used as a tool in employee career development which will show employees that the company cares enough to invest both time and knowledge in them. Employees who are thus continuously trained, prepared and encouraged toward career advancement are much more likely to stay motivated on the job and stay with the company for the long run.
Another means of employee retention are incentive based programs. Incentive programs can improve communication and build positive attitudes of employees who are assigned to do similar tasks. The most effective incentive programs have well-defined goals that clearly indicate job standards and rewards. They also recognize employees who acquire new skills and open lines of communication with management (Material, 2005). These programs always improve productivity, which leads to higher profits. Incentive travel programs are the most recognized and successful motivational tools available. They provide a 'once-in-a-lifetime' experience designed to motivate people and recognize participants for meeting exceptional levels of performance in support of a company's goals. A company looking for new and innovative ways to increase its revenue and profits, improve customer satisfaction, promote team building, or provide a platform for both training and reaching new business goals, may want to invest in an incentive program as demonstrated through the Capital One example (Pfeffer & Veiga, 1999).
Capital One, a well known credit card company, uses company shares as an incentive plan to retain top employees. The top merit of this plan is that it aligns itself with the return on investment to its shareholders. "We uphold the belief that, as owners, associates change the way they view their jobs, each other, and Capital One because there is a personal financial stake in the success of the company" (Pollitt, 2003).
Riordan could also retain key employees by offering shares as performance benefits, thus giving its employees a strong sense of ownership in the company which can be highly empowering and empowerment is an almost certain path to employee motivation.
Rewards and compensation are another human capital retention area that Riordan needs to improve through learning best practices from other companies. Turning employees into owners by having management give up some control of the work process and by rewarding successful employees and teams is what has made Nucor Steel successful in retaining skilled employees (Nucor, 2006). Nucor is proving the value of empowering their employees and has gained their loyalty. In an industry, which has seen many companies go out of business or move out of the United States, Nucor stand alone in that the company has not lain off or furloughed a single employee for lack of work in the past 20 years. Knowing they can triple their salary by delivering defect free steel is motivation to stay with Nucor. If the company has a sub- par year employees make less than the industry average for wages but as they continue to have record sales years with top quality steel, the employees will make well over the industry average wage (Nucor, 2006). Another benefit that has become very popular and contributes to employee retention is Nucor's commitment to their employees' families by offering four-year scholarships of up to $2,500 per year for their children. This not only invests in the employees' future but their family's as well. The ultimate test of all HR strategies, of course, is whether they align properly with organizational goals.
The benefits of a workforce strengthened by proper motivation and enhanced performance through compensation, incentives and career development are extensive but to mitigate the risk associated with the expenses involved in these remedies, companies such as Riordan need to align all of them with the company's vision and strategic plan. The importance of proper alignment of HR strategies with organizational goals is evident in the Best Buy example.
Best Buy CEO Brad Anderson requested more creative incentive programs to be implemented for Best Buy employees. Stock options were the primary incentives that had been used by the company. Feedback was obtained from the managers and executives currently participating in the incentives program and a plan offering a mix of performance shares and restricted stock was developed. The plan offers employees 4 different options to choose from. Jack Dolmat-Connell, CEO of an executive compensation consulting firm, says when a company offers choices in incentive plan they are recognizing that different employees have different needs. Choices will help employees find that right one for them and will ultimately help with recruitment and retention efforts. Best Buy conducted a follow-up survey which showed that offering a choice of incentive options lead 83% of the respondents to remain with the company (Marquez, 2006).
Offering stock options to Riordan's employees as another form of compensation will not only give employees choices it also creates incentives for the knowledge base of the company to stay with it during this critical time of transition. Potential employees will see stock options as a benefit of employment with Riordan therefore adding value to recruitment efforts, another critical organizational strategy during this time. .
Analysis of Alternative Solutions (Step 5)
Alternative # 1: Regularly evaluating the performance of employees recognizing the star performers, both individuals and teams, and providing them with individualized training programs that encourage them to stay with and advance within the company will advance all three of Riordan's goals to increase overall employee job satisfaction, improve compensation package and employee retention.
Alternative # 2: Initiating a fundamental culture change throughout the company and establishing a mentor program to develop the next generation of management according to the new company culture affects employee job satisfaction and employee retention through establishing a new culture of trust that fosters career development, but has only a moderate effect on improving the compensation package.
Alternative # 3: Rewarding and celebrating both small and large successes within the company similarly affects employee job satisfaction and employee retention through motivating employees to perform at their best in all instances, but it has less of an effect on the compensation package.
Alternative # 4: Investing in continuous learning programs to promote employee career development affects all three company goals positively. Continuous learning is an excellent tool in employee career development and will show employees that the company cares enough to invest both time and knowledge in them. Employees who are thus continuously trained, prepared and encouraged toward career advancement are much more likely to stay motivated on the job and stay with the company for the long run.
Alternative # 5: Offering company stock options to employees as performance benefits, gives employees a strong sense of ownership in the company and has an equal effect on all three of Riordan's goals. It will raise the satisfaction level of high performers by improving the compensation they receive and thus encourage them to stay.
Alternative #6: Giving employees control some of the work processes will impart to them a sense of ownership in the company thus empowering and motivating them to perform better. This alternative is a crucial one even though it does not have a direct impact on the compensation package, because employees who feel they have ownership in the company are more likely to stay with the company.
Table 3
Analysis of Alternative Solutions
Alternative Solution Evaluation Matrix
Alternatives Scale: 1 = Low, 3 = Medium, 5 = High Goal 1
Increase Overall Employee Job Satisfaction Goal 2
Improve Compensation Package Goal 3
Improve Employee Retention Goal 4
Goal 5
Goal 6 Totals
25% 25% 50% 100%
First Tier
Alternative 1
Regular performance evaluation and recognition of team and individual star performers 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.5= 2.5 5
Alternative 2 Fundamental culture change and establishment of a mentor program 5
5*.25= 1.25 3
3*.25= .75 5
5*.5= 2.5 4.5
Alternative 3
Reward and celebrate all small and large successes 5
5*.25= 1.25 3
3*.25= .75 5
5*.5= 2.5 4.5
Alternative 4
Invest in continuous learning 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.5= 2.5 5
Alternative 5
Offer company stock options to employees as performance benefits 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.5= 2.5 5
Alternative 6
Give employees control over some of the work processes 5
5*.25= 1.25 3
3*.25= .75 5
5*.5= 2.5 4.5
Second Tier
Alternative 1
Design a compensation package that: includes regular performance evaluations and recognition of team and individual star performers; rewards and celebrates all small and large successes; invests in continuous learning; and offers company stock options to employees as performance benefits 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.5= 2.5 5
Alternative 2
Design a non-monetary motivation plan that: includes fundamental culture change and establishment of a mentor program; and empowers employees through giving them control over some of the work processes 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.25= 1.25 5
5*.5= 2.5 5

Narrowed List of Alternatives
Alternative 1: Design a compensation package that: includes regular performance evaluations and recognition of team and individual star performers; rewards and celebrates all small and large successes; invests in continuous learning; and offers company stock options to employees as performance benefits.
Alternative 2: Design a non-monetary motivation plan that: includes fundamental culture change and establishment of a mentor program; and empowers employees through giving them control over some of the work processes
Risk Assessment and Mitigation Techniques (Step 6)
There will always be risk associated with change and both options on the narrowed list of alternatives involve change. The following is a list of the potential risks and ways to minimize those risks.
The first alternative to design a compensation package can become time consuming, expensive and runs the risk of failure through neglect, poor execution and failure to evaluate the direct results on company goals. To mitigate these risks the compensation package must be rigorously planned in accordance with the company's strategic goals and have measurable results. Riordan's HR department must be both empowered and charged with the responsibility to make the compensation package a success.
The second alternative which involves designing a non-monetary motivation plan that includes fundamental culture change, establishment of a mentor program, and empowering employees is also time consuming, and can become costly if it fails to retain employees after they have gone through expensive training programs. The company also runs the risk of employees overstepping their bounds and causing chaos.
The benefits from a strengthened workforce are extensive but to mitigate the risk associated with training and education, Riordan would need to align all training and education with the company's vision and strategic plan. One way would be to cross train manufacturing employees and compensating them for the training, also setting up leadership mentoring programs with clearly defined boundaries for employee authority.
Table 4
Risk Assessment and Mitigation Techniques
Risk Assessment and Mitigation Techniques
Alternative Solution Risks and Probability Consequence and Severity Mitigation Techniques
Alternative 1
Design a compensation package that: includes regular performance evaluations and recognition of team and individual star performers; rewards and celebrates all small and large successes; invests in continuous learning; and offers company stock options to employees as performance benefits ? Failure to execute
? Failure to measure results

? Loss of time
? Loss of money
? Failure to meet future vision goals such as employee retention
? Goals must be aligned with company strategy
? Empower HR department to be responsible for execution
? Measurable results
Alternative 2
Design a non-monetary motivation plan that: includes fundamental culture change and establishment of a mentor program; and empowers employees through giving them control over some of the work processes ? Failure to execute
? Failure to measure results

? Employees could overstep their boundaries

? Loss of time
? Loss of money
? Failure to meet future vision goals
? Cross training manufacturing employees
? Goals must be aligned with company strategy
? Establish a clear framework for where worker authority begins and ends

Optimal Solution (Step 7)
There is seldom a single best solution to any problem. Rather there are usually a set or range of alternatives, one or more of which may work. This step of the 9-step problem solving model entails the identification of those alternatives and any assumptions and constraints that may exist which can limit the identification of possibilities or creative solutions and alternatives (UOPOb, 2006).The optimal solution for Riordan is to use both tier 2 solutions simultaneously, because this will allow the company to both motivate and retain employees and it can shorten the overall schedule for both alternatives, which partially mitigates the cons for both alternatives.

Implementation Plan (Step 8)
Michael Riordan has committed to spending the money needed to make the necessary improvements and recommendations from Barbara Masterson of Human Capital Consulting who was hired to look at the issues being discussed. While the recommended changes will begin to be implemented immediately, it will take some time to complete based on the number of manufacturing plants and employees involved. Implementation will occur in stages over the next 12 months (UOPOa, 2006).
The first stage to complete will be the salary survey and adjustments needed to position Riordan competitively in the marketplace with regard to base wages and salaries. This will take three months to complete. The second stage to complete will be the compensation package based on the changes in the sales strategy and will incorporate all employees who support the sales process including the R&D team. During this development process training will be ongoing with regard to the new sales strategy. This will take six months to complete. The third and final stage will be to develop a performance appraisal process, which will provide a clearer understanding and alignment with the strategic plan and the employee reward system. The appraisal process will identify superior performers for potential advancement but will also identify employees who are not performing up to the clearly defined performance expectations and allow for actions to be taken to remedy the situation, either improvement or termination. This will take 12 months to complete (UOPOa, 2006).

Table 5
Optimal Solution Implementation Plan
Deliverable Timeline Who is Responsible
Salary Survey 3 months from start Barbara Masterson of Human Capital Consulting
New Compensation Package 6 months from start Riordan Human Resources Department
Training program 6 months from start Riordan Human Resources Department
Performance Appraisal Process 12 months from start Riordan Human Resources Department

Evaluation of Results (Step 9)
In the end, Riordan can define success by looking back at the end-state goals. Measurements of overall employee satisfaction will be captured at the end of one year with the goal of scoring greater than 4.0. After implementing the new compensation package, the goal was to reach a rating of 4.0 or greater in the next year. The final goal will be realized if the consolidated voluntary separation rate is less than 4% also at year's end. Future success will be defined by continually achievement of the end-state goals for years to come.
Riordan Manufacturing can realize success by implementing improvements to solve the underlying problem with human resource management. Through thorough analysis and problem definition, strategic advantage in human resources can become reality at Riordan Manufacturing. By making the suggested changes, Riordan Manufacturing will remain a successful global plastics producer by building and retaining an energized and productive workforce.
Table 6
Evaluation of Results
End-State Goals Metrics Target
Increase Overall Employee Job Satisfaction Employee job satisfaction survey Score greater than 4.0
Improve Compensation Package 1. Employee separation rate
2. Employee job satisfaction survey 1. Less than 4%
2. Score greater than 4.0
Improve Employee Retention
Employee retention rate Less than 4%

Conclusion
The advantages of using the 9-step problem-solving model correctly become clear once managers put it to use in identifying the problem that truly needs solving among an array of challenges such as those facing Riordan . To identify this problem using the 9-step model, as in the Riordan case scenario, it is first necessary to describe the situation (Riordan's need to adopt a customer-relationship management (CRM) system). This first step of the 9-step model is in itself a 3step process involving identification of the issues (the need for employee retention and training, the need to align HR direction with new organizational goals, low employee morale) and opportunities (learning better retention practices, using a strategically aligned incentive program to motivate and encourage employees to stay , and using measurable training as a basis for merit raises) as well as stakeholder perspectives and ethical dilemmas (balancing the needs of investors, customers and employees). The next two steps of the model are to define the problem (the need to build and retain a loyal and productive workforce). Only after completing the critical first three steps it becomes possible to move on toward steps four through nine of the model, identifying (4) and evaluating (5) alternatives and assessing their positive and negative risks (6) , making the necessary decisions (7), implementing the decisions (8) and evaluating the results (UOPOb, 2006).

References
A Story to Tell. (2005, October). A Story to Tell. T+D, 59(10), p54-56. Retrieved December 3 2006, from EBSCOhost database.
Correll, J. (2004, March).Motivation-building: The top ten most-effective ways of
motivating greater team member performance. Retrieved December 3, 2006, from: http://www.correllconcepts.com/Motivation-creator/motivation-building.htm.
Dreher, George, & Dougherty, Thomas W. (2001). Human resource strategy: A behavioral perspective for general managers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Human Resource Management International Digest. (2002, July). Culture change stems the outflow of talent at Alberto-Culver. Human Resource Management International Digest, 10, pp. 10-12. Retrieved December 3 2006 from Emerald database.
Marquez, Jessica. (2006, April 24). Best Buy offers choice in its long-term incentive program to keep the best and brightest. Workforce Management, 85(8), p. 42-43. Retrieved December 3, 2006, from EBSCOhost database.
Noe, Raymond, Hollenbeck, John, Gerhert, Barry, & Wright, Patrick. (2004). Fundamentals of human resource management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nucor. (2006, June). Turning employees into owners. Work & Family Newsbrief, 5. Retrieved December 3, 2006, from RDS database
Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J. F. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 13, p. 43.
Pollitt, David. (2003, April). Workers' playtime at Capital One Company puts the emphasis on employees having fun. Human Resource Management International Digest, 11(2), p. 4-9. Retrieved December 3, 2006 from Emerald database.
Stone, W.P. (2000). Training and development. American Society for Training and
Development Magazine, 15, p. 27.
University of Phoenix Online (2006a). Scenario: Global Communications. University of Phoenix Online White Papers. Online: https://mycampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resource.asp
University of Phoenix Online (2006b). Problem Solving Based Scenarios: An Approach to Identify Opportunities to create Value for the Business. University of Phoenix Online White Papers. Online: https://mycampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resource.asp
VNU Business Media. (2006, April). Rules of engagement: beat burnout in call centers with rewards and recognition. Sales & Marketing Management, 158(3), p. 18. ISSN: 0163-7517. Retrieved December 3, 2006, from RDS database.

Related Questions