Homework answers / question archive / This is going to be a minimum of 8 pages critical thinking analysis paper

This is going to be a minimum of 8 pages critical thinking analysis paper

Writing

Share With

This is going to be a minimum of 8 pages critical thinking analysis paper. The topic is going to be on Martin Luther King Jr’s “The Other America” speech. https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/the-other-america-speech-transcript-martin-luther-king-jr/amp You can choose to do either critique but please incorporate the questions from your choice of critique in the paper. You must also include the consider the broad categories in the paper (content, organization, style, and correctness).
You were introduced to Paul Elder's Critical Thinking Model and with your group, you took each element, created a visual presentation and a written report on a topic. It is now your turn to practice that model with written as well as visual resources on a topic of your choosing. For this paper, you will use some of those elements in a Critical Analysis paper. For this week you will begin work on a rough draft. Please see your instructions below. I anticipate questions for this paper, so please do not hesitate to ask: The Format of the Formal Essay Critique Paper For your formal paper, your essay will be about 8 pages with at least four sources. For this essay, I’m offering you two possible approaches to the essay; CHOOSE ONLY ONE APPROACH FOR YOUR PAPER, but regardless of the approach, please consider the broad categories of content, organization, style, and correctness. Broad Categories to Consider 1. Content: Consider the topic (its appropriateness and interest for the assignment as well as a clear focus suitable to essay length) and the way the topic is developed (clarity sufficiency of its argument, its scope, subcategories, amount and type of examples, anecdotes, evidence, etc.). 2. Organization: Consider how the essay is introduced and concluded (especially looking for a “frame” to the essay, where the intro and conclusion refer to the same idea), whether the thesis is located in the most helpful place (direct or implied), how the essay is structured, whether the order or extent of development is successful, as well as how individual paragraphs are organized (clear topic sentences, appropriate and concrete evidence, logical organization of evidence). 3. Style: Style can refer to the overall style of an essay: whether the tone is appropriate (humorous, serious, reflective, satirical, etc.), whether you use sufficient and appropriate variety (factual, analytical, evaluative, reflective), whether you use sufficient creativity. Style can also refer to the style of individual sentences: whether you use a variety of sentences styles and lengths, whether sentences are worded clearly, and whether word choice is interesting and appropriate. 4. Correctness: Correctness refers to grammar, punctuation, and form of the essay. You do not need to know the exact grammatical term or rule to know when a sentence is not correct. Even though you may not know the term dangling modifier, you could identify that the following sentence is not correct: SPECIFIC APPROACHES Below are more detailed questions to consider when responding to individual types of essays. First, make sure that you have reviewed the description of the essay mode in the Essay Assignment Guidelines. Use at least one or two of these when responding to an essay. Do not simply answer yes or no; offer specific evidence from the text and elaborate on the reasons behind your answer. CRITICAL REVIEW CRITIQUE 1. Does a direct thesis convey both the subject and the reviewer’s value judgment? 2. Does the review provide a summary or description to help you experience the film, music, event, etc.? Note places where the author provides too much or too little detail. 3. Does the essay clearly identify relevant criteria for evaluation? Are they appropriate, believable, and consistent? 4. Are any important features of the reviewed subject omitted? 5. Logos (logic, content): Does the essay provide sufficient, relevant, and interesting details and examples to adequately inform and entertain? 6. Ethos (author): Does the author’s judgment seem sound and convincing? 7. Pathos (emotional appeals): Does the author responsibly and effectively utilize emotional appeals to the audience? 8. Does the author include adequate reference to the opposition and respond to that opposition appropriately? DOCUMENTED ARGUMENT CRITIQUE 1. Is the thesis clear, argumentative, and effective? Why or why not? 2. Are the topic and thesis are reasonable for the assignment, audience, and context of the essay? 3. Does the author define his or her terms and provide sufficient background information? What ideas or terms are undefined or inadequately explained? 4. Is the thesis supported by clear reasons? Are the reasons clearly worded and supported sufficiently? 5. Do the reasons fit logically together and are they placed in the right order? 6. Does the author adequately address the opposition? What is another opposing argument he/she should or could have addressed? 7. Has the author done adequate research? 8. Are the works cited adequately introduced and explained before citing from them? 9. Does the paper contain an appropriate blend of well-placed quotations within a context of the author’s own words and paraphrases from other sources? 10.Is the writer clearly in charge, naturally introducing and interacting with sources rather than merely reporting on them? 11. Do you find the argument convincing? What might you add or omit?