Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Assignment Part B: Case Study Description Marks out of Wtg(%) Due date Assignment Part B: Case Study 40 40
Assignment Part B: Case Study
Description | Marks out of | Wtg(%) | Due date |
Assignment Part B: Case Study | 40 | 40.00% | Due 4 October2022 |
Task overview |
2000 words (Show final word-count at the foot of your assignment.) Times New Roman font size 12 You are required to provide a precis of the dispute you described in your Abstract A- (deidentify parties if needed). Link the academic literature to the dispute when answering the following questions. 1. What type of dispute is it? – Having applied Moore’s Conflict Circle to your dispute in Abstract A. Now describe and apply an alternative model to analyse the causes of the dispute. 2. Identify the parties. Describe how you would achieve this identification using the process identified in your Textbook pp. 7-8. 3. Is there a legislated dispute scheme applicable to this dispute? Provide the name of the legislation and the process it adopts. Notwithstanding this legislative scheme, for the remainder of your assessment answers you are to address the dispute as if that legislative scheme did not exist. 4. Select a process for managing the dispute that would be most suited to the parties needs and support why you would choose this process. Clearly support your answer by reference to your course materials. 5. As a dispute practitioner managing this dispute provide detail of the communications and techniques you would apply and why. Give some actual examples of this communication. ie. party said – I said. 6. No matter which process you use in your dispute describe what technique you are most likely to use to gather information (namely style of interview see Module 4) and name the part of the process in which this would be utilised) If interviewing is the sole dispute process you would use describe the style of interview you would use and why this would be the best process to manage the dispute. 7. Address any special ethical and emotional or other special considerations that could arise in this dispute. Explain how you would best address them? 8. Conclude by summarising the key reasons the process and model you have chosen would be the one most suited to dealing with this dispute. Describe any other process options you consider and how they could aid in management of the dispute but why you have not chosen them as the first process to utilise. Please listen to the Case Study B recording before attempting this assessment. Please answer ALL questions. |
Assessed objectives |
1. Demonstrate an understanding [explain and apply] of a coherent body of knowledge [relevant to dispute management], and underlying principles and concepts; the broader contexts within which legal issues arise; and of the principles and values of justice and of ethical practice in lawyers’ roles [in this area], (PO1/TLO1) |
2. Demonstrate an understanding [explain and apply] of approaches to ethical decision making, an ability to recognise and reflect upon (and a developing ability to respond to) ethical issues likely to arise [in the context of dispute management], an ability to recognise and reflect upon the professional responsibilities of lawyers in promoting justice and in service to the community, and a developing ability to exercise professional judgment (PO2/TLO2) 3. Identify and articulate issues [relevant to dispute management]; [comprehend legal and other materials]; generate appropriate practical responses to issues [that may arise in dispute management]; engage in critical analysis and make a reasoned and appropriate choice amongst alternatives, and think creatively in approaching [disputes] and generating appropriate responses [through the use of dispute management methods] (PO3/TLO3) 4. Communicate in ways that are effective, appropriate and persuasive for legal and non-legal audiences (PO5/TLO5). |
|
Length: | 2000 words (Show final word-count at the foot of your assignment.) |
Style: | You can complete this exercise using either essay writing style or case report style. The assignment must be referenced using AGLC reference style. Please note on your paper which program you are studying in. For further support in assignment writing you can refer to http://www.usq.edu.au/learningcentre/assignment-skills Law Essay Tutorial on the Law Student Hub – this incorporates both writing and research aspects Essay Writing Quick Tips Essentials of essay writing on the Library website |
Marking criteria (copy and paste this Marking Rubric at the end of your
assignment before submission)
Criteria | Marks |
Demonstrates a developed understanding of dispute management (DM) (explain and identify) and the application of DM principles, processes, and practices through appropriate application of the literature to the case study. (CO 1, 2) |
/10 |
Shows relevant use of course information and materials including referencing of the text and sources indicated in the text or any selected readings to support observations and justify your answers as it applies to the case study. (CO 1,3,4) |
/10 |
Demonstrate how the dispute can be adequately managed using the chosen process and any ethical or other special considerations that may arise and how they would be managed. (CO 1,2,3) |
/10 |
Communicate in the written form clearly and succinctly (CO 4) | /5 |
Observe university policies on written assessment items and produces original work. Uses appropriate referencing skills (AGLC). (CO 2, 4) |
/5 |
Turnitin | % |
TOTAL | /40 |