Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Assessment of Project Throughout your practicum experience, you have been designing and implementing a project

Assessment of Project Throughout your practicum experience, you have been designing and implementing a project

Sociology

Assessment of Project Throughout your practicum experience, you have been designing and implementing a project. You will now assess that experience. Prior to beginning this paper, discuss the topics below with your preceptor. Include their feedback as well as your own. In a 1,250-1,500 word document, discuss the following topics: 1. What was the focus of your leadership project, the goals you set for yourself, and the AONE competencies you hoped to achieve? 2. How did you discover the need for this project, and how did it fit into the organization’s philosophy and mission? 3. Did you encounter any real or potential barriers during your practicum experience related to your project? 4. Discuss how the outcomes of your project will be measured? Is your project one that is sustainable or is it designed to be a single occurrence? 5. Evaluate the success of your project. If you were not able to implement your project, discuss why. What are the next steps for the project? Use a minimum of two peer-reviewed resources (published within the last 5 years) as evidence to support your views. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Course Code NUR-674 Class Code NUR-674-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Focus, Goals, and Competencies 15.0% Project Needs 15.0% Barriers 15.0% Outcomes 15.0% Project Success 10.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Assessment of Project 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A description of focus of the project, including goals and AONE competencies, is not present. A description of how the need for the project was determined and alignment to the philosophy and mission of the organization is not present. A description of potential or real barriers faced during the practicum project experience is not present. OutcomesA description of how the outcomes of the project will be measured and if it is sustainable is not present. An evaluation of the success of the project or causes of its lack of success is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 175.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) A description of focus of the project, including goals and AONE competencies, is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the need for the project was determined and alignment to the philosophy and mission of the organization is incomplete or incorrect. A description of potential or real barriers faced during the practicum project experience is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the outcomes of the project will be measured and if it is sustainable is incomplete or incorrect. An evaluation of the success of the project or causes of its lack of success is incomplete or incorrect. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) A description of focus of the project, including goals and AONE competencies, is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the need for the project was determined and alignment to the philosophy and mission of the organization is included but lacks supporting details. A description of potential or real barriers faced during the practicum project experience is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the outcomes of the project will be measured and if it is sustainable is included but lacks supporting details. An evaluation of the success of the project or causes of its lack of success is included but lacks supporting details. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (92.00%) A description of focus of the project, including goals and AONE competencies, is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the need for the project was determined and alignment to the philosophy and mission of the organization is complete and includes supporting details. A description of potential or real barriers faced during the practicum project experience is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the outcomes of the project will be measured and if it is sustainable is complete and includes supporting details. An evaluation of the success of the project or causes of its lack of success is complete and includes supporting details. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) A description of focus of the project, including goals and AONE competencies, is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the need for the project was determined and alignment to the philosophy and mission of the organization is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of potential or real barriers faced during the practicum project experience is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the outcomes of the project will be measured and if it is sustainable is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. An evaluation of the success of the project or causes of its lack of success is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

12.89 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions