Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Discussion: Group Dynamics In March of 1991 the nation was captivated by a video of police officers in Los Angeles, California as they were attempting to arrest Rodney King

Discussion: Group Dynamics In March of 1991 the nation was captivated by a video of police officers in Los Angeles, California as they were attempting to arrest Rodney King

Law

Discussion: Group Dynamics

In March of 1991 the nation was captivated by a video of police officers in Los Angeles, California as they were attempting to arrest Rodney King. Several officers were involved after King initially evaded police and led them on a chase that started on Interstate 210, covered more than 10 miles and exceeded speeds of 80 MPH through residential streets, ending when officers were able to block King and his two passengers at an intersection. A man (George Holliday) who lived nearby, filmed the encounter and offered it to police before providing it to a local television station when the police were not interested in seeing the video. This case was one of the earliest examples of modern surveillance, where incidents involving the police are recorded with video cameras and more recently, cell phones.

Police use of force is perhaps the most polarizing issue within the field of criminal justice today. Few actions are more difficult than having maybe five seconds to make a potentially life-threatening decision and then having that action scrutinized by others for weeks or months. Some departments employ a use of force continuum while others make use of other methods to assist officers in making decisions to elevate the amount of force necessary to make an arrest. Most police officers like to know they have backup available if needed. Does it always help? Does it make things worse at times? Does having additional officers present change the way one may interact with a subject? Consider the case of Eric Garner from 2014; often when multiple officers are attempting to subdue a suspect, one may not know when the suspect is resisting and when another officer is exerting force. Are the cell phone videos of bystanders sufficient to provide an accurate and adequate perspective? Typically, those videos do not begin until after the crisis has already started, potentially missing key events.

According to Black (1976), police are more likely to use force based on the attributes of the concerned parties. This sociological theory of law prescribes that police are least likely to take corrective action against lower status persons, particularly minorities and the poor, when the accusers are also of lower status. Similarly, they are more likely to take action against lower status persons whose accusers are of a higher status. Your text introduces the concept of deindividuation in chapter 10. Used primarily to explain group behavior, it may also have implications with police officers in certain crisis situations. In Festinger’s (1952) seminal work, he argued that deindividuation occurs when individuals immerse themselves in the group to the point of losing some sense of self, becoming anonymous and doing things they would not likely do if alone. Closely related to contagion, also discussed in your text, this may help to explain what happens in crisis events such as the one discussed above.

Consider the case of Amadou Diallo as you address the discussion thread this week.

  • Do you think deindividuation or contagion applied to the case of Rodney King and/or Diallo? Did responding officers act in accordance with accepted use of force standards?
  • What is the responsibility of police leadership when their officers are accused of excessive use of force?

Take a definitive position and defend it with evidence from the literature.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Deindividuation and police officers

Response

I think deindividuation applied to the case of Rodney King. King, during his arrest, tried evading police officers by running through the residential streets.  Rodney compromised the situation by evading police through the residential streets where other residents were involved. It could not be easier to identify him while in the middle of the crowd if it happened. Deindividuation involves phenomena in which people engage in seemingly strange situations in which they believe they cannot be personally identified. Sometimes the phenomena may result in violent acts endangering the lives of people not involved. However, deindividuation occurs when a person's identity with a group overrides their own identity and self-awareness. Deindividuation prevents critical thinking and dissent (Spears, 2017).

The police officers did not act per accepted use of force standards. Chasing Rodney King through a residential street could endanger the lives of uninvolved civilians. I think there were other better ways which they could have used to arrest him. The police officers could, for instance, gather information from the civilians or family members on where to find King and arrest him peacefully.  Or instead, the police could have used the court to sermon him.  From the film recorded by a  nearby resident,  we learn that the police officers beat up King after arresting him.  I oppose this act since I don't think the police were justified in beating the unarmed King. Were it not for the film recorded, the police officers would have gone unpunished, which would be very unfair to Rodney King. The police officers used excessive force to arrest King, which is not correct.

Police officers have no right to use excessive force unless the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injuries to the officers or others (Kochel, Wilson & Mastrofski, 2011). In any other case, when a police officer is claimed to have used excessive force, he or she becomes answerable to the court.  If a police officer used excessive force against a subject, the subject has legal rights to file a civil rights complaint under 42 USC Section 1983 of the United States Code (Smith & Holmes, 2014). It is the responsibility of police leadership to ensure that their officers follow the rules and respect civilians' rights. Police leadership should also ensure that once an officer breaks the rules, he or she faces the law. This helps to maintain peace and order among the police and civilians. Police officers should ensure that people follow the rules and order and that lawbreakers are punished, which is in line with the scripture that says, "Man as covenant-breaker is in "enmity against God" (Rom. 8:7) and is subject to "the law of sin and death" (Rom. 8:2),"

Related Questions