Question 1: Using the MLB steroids case as an example, explain how unethical choices by some players harms players who comply with the rules

1. Using the MLB steroids case as an example, explain how unethical choices by some players harms players who comply with the rules.

            The unethical practices by different players have continued to record more players in the athletic fields, which impacts the entire team based on the set rules.  The investigation on MLB steroids revealed that some players used steroids to boost their performance. Unethical choices such as the use of steroids contribute to critical harms to other players who comply with the rules.  The harmful impacts include a lifetime ban from MLB or a ban of some players from participating in baseball games. Steroids improve the player's morale by boosting their speed and agility, thus outdoing those who don't apply the drugs. This activity is unethical since it harms the players who comply with the set rules. In addition, the event creates inequalities in the leagues, which makes the team that does not use steroids demotivated and undermined in their career (Cisyk & Courty, 2015).

            Moreover, the unethical action to apply MLB steroids contributes to more consequences to the entire team, including managers and coaches of the team. The baseball policies provide that members identified using performance-enhancing drugs will be effectively banned from participating in the games. If the player has won during the gaming events, the entire team will bear the consequences. This indicates that one player involved in unethical choices contributes to harm to other ethical players. The players who comply with the set policies are always professional, career-based, and passionate about fairly achieving their set objectives. Hence, being a player, it is vital to observe ethical choices to avoid the use of steroids and reduce adverse harm to another player.