QN

CLO

Criteria/

Kriteria

Weight/ Pemberat

Excellent/

Cemerlang

Good/

Baik

Fair/

Sederhana

Poor/

Lemah

Unsatisfactory/ Tidak memuaskan

Max Marks

4

3

2

1

0

1

1

1.

Introduction

1.5

The introduction on the topic of discussion is excellent; ideas to be discussed are very clear and well organized. The intent of the work is explicitly explained.Well developed introduction.

The introduction on the topic of discussion is good; ideas to be discussed are relatively clear and organized but inadequate explanation. The intent of the work is plainly explained but  creates interests.

The introduction on the topic of discussion is adequately explain the background but may lack detail; ideas to be discussed are vague and disorganized. The intent of the work is unclear.

The introduction on the topic of discussion is weak; background details a random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic.  ideas are vague and disorganized. The intent of the work is not included.

No introduction.

6

1

1

2.

Explanation on “golden hour” in trauma care

3

Demonstrates an excellent understanding on “golden hour” in trauma care through thorough exploration and description with a large extent of critical thinking skills. Broadly includes relevant and specific evidence.

Demonstrates a good understanding on “golden hour” in trauma care through

reasonable and adequate description with a moderate extent of critical thinking skills. Specific supportive evidence is included.

Demonstrates a fairly good understanding on “golden hour” in trauma care through

relevant but inadequate description with some extent of critical thinking skills.

Demonstrates a poor understanding on “golden hour” in trauma care as the description is irrelevant. Hardly use critical thinking skills.

Does not explain the “golden hour” in trauma care.

12

3.

Critical discussion on the concept of “golden hour” by highlighting its implications to the current trauma system

4

The discussion on the concept of “golden hour” and its implications to the current trauma system is significant and exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed with a large extent of critical thinking skills. Supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as examples.

The discussion on the concept of “golden hour” and its implications to the current trauma system is significant and well-presented; ideas are detailed with moderate extent of critical thinking skills and supported with relevant evidence.

The discussion on the concept of “golden hour” and its implications to the current trauma system is rational but organizations of ideas are not in order with some extent of analytical skills.

Examples are irrelevant.

The discussion on the concept of “golden hour” and its implications to the current trauma system is irrational and there is no sense of organization of ideas.

There is no discussion on the concept of “golden hour” and its implications to the current trauma system.

16

1

1

4.

Conclusion

1.5

An excellent conclusion which is concisely and precisely written. It provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

A good conclusion which indicates significant analysis and synthesis of ideas.

A fair conclusion indicates reasonable analysis and synthesis of ideas.

A poor conclusion which does not indicate an attempt to synthesize the discussion.

No conclusion.

   6

1

1

5.

Presentation:
Articulation and organization of ideas and perspectives

1

Demonstrates a well-focused writing; arguments or perspectives are precisely defined and explained; demonstrates coherent flow in developing insightful ideas.

Demonstrates clear arguments or perspectives; organized flow in writing but not deep enough to be very perceptive.

Demonstrates vague arguments or perspectives; the writing lacked an organized flow and the ideas were hard to follow.

Does not show any original thinking or perspectives; chaotic in organization and presentation of ideas.

Demonstrates a very bad entry; the work is completely not original.

4

1

1

6.

References and citations

1.5

All citations are included in the discussion and references match the citations according to the APA format.

Most citations are included in the discussion and most references match with the citations according to the APA format.

Some citations for statements included in the discussion or references which are included are not found in the text.

Citations for statements included in the discussion are not present or references which are included are not found in the text.

There is no reference or citation, or references are outdated or wrong format.

6

Total

12.5

50