Fail (0)

Fail

Pass

Credit

Distinction

High Distinction

Total

Structure and clarity of work/ writing structure (including spelling/grammar/ paragraph structure)

No attempt,

or

The report is difficult

to comprehend and

is inappropriately

structured.

Paragraphs are hard to follow, and the writing does not flow because of the lack of structure. Writing is very choppy. There are few to no ransition statements which connect the ideas in the report. Work is difficult to comprehend because of grammar and spelling errors, or there are many incomplete or run-on sentences. It appears that grammar and spellcheck were not used.

Many paragraphs lack a topic sentence, or the detail sentences do not flow from the topic sentence. Detail sentences do not follow the order introduced in the topic sentence. Work is hard to follow because of the paragraph structure. The writing is choppy, and the reader doesn’t understand how we got to the current topic or concept from the previous one. There are many errors in grammar and spelling including incomplete or run-on sentences throughout the report.

Nearly all paragraphs have a topic sentence and detail sentences which flesh out the topic. Some paragraphs do not flesh out the topic in the order introduced in the topic sentence. There are some places where the reader doesn’t understand how the previous concept or topic connects to the current one. Few errors in grammar, spelling, or sentence structure

Nearly all paragraphs have a topic sentence and detail sentences which flesh out the topic. Some paragraphs do not flesh out the topic in the order introduced in the topic sentence. There are some places where the reader doesn’t understand how the previous concept or topic connects to the current one. Few errors in grammar, spelling, or sentence structure

All paragraphs have a topic sentence. Detail sentences flesh out the information from the topic sentence in the order introduced in the topic sentence. End of paragraph leads into the next topic. The reader experiences no interruption to the flow and understands how each concept or topic connects to the previous one. Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

/4

Critically evaluate the blockchain solution (Integration of Knowledge)

No attempt,

or

The evaluation

shows lack of

understanding of

blockchain

concepts.

Copies information without analysis. The evaluation does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood the blockchain solution. The position taken may be simplistic and obvious. Little or no awareness that position may have limits or context

The analysis is limited, somewhat inappropriate or little analysis of the blockchain solution. May contain inaccuracies or omissions that interfere with analysis and/or meaning. The evaluation demonstrates that the author understands blockchain concepts. The evaluation is somewhat simplified, with some sense of multiple approaches. Minor or vague consideration of theoretical concepts. Some acknowledgement that the position taken may have limits. May not acknowledge context.

The information is analysed for accuracy, relevance and validity relating to the blockchain solution. Minor inaccuracies or omissions may interfere with analysis or meaning. The evaluation demonstrates that the author understands blockchain concepts. The author acknowledges multiple approaches. There are some consideration of theoretical concepts. May not fully acknowledge limits of position or context but is aware of limits or context.

The information is analysed for accuracy, relevance and validity relating to the blockchain solution. Minor inaccuracies or omissions do not interfere with analysis or meaning. The evaluation demonstrates that the author has considered limited blockchain concepts. The author acknowledges multiple approaches. The author fully acknowledge the limits of position or context but is aware of limits or context.

Clearly analyses information for accuracy, relevance, and validity relating to the blockchain solution. The evaluation demonstrates that the author has considered various blockchain concepts. The author clearly applies a multidimensional approach by synthesising various perspectives. The author acknowledges the limits of position or context.

/12

Analysis of the Business

No attempt, or The analysis is inappropriate or no analyse or no link to the blockchain solution

The analysis is irrelevant to the selected blockchain solution. Little or no analysis of the issues in the case study.

The analysis is slightly relevant to the blockchain solution. Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis of some of the identified issues; omits some components.

The analysis is relevant to the blockchain solution. Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified; missing some necessary components.

The analysis is relevant to the blockchain solution and aligned to the business context. Presents a thorough analysis of all identified issues/problems; includes all necessary components.

The analysis is aligned with the blockchain solution. Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all identified issues/problems; includes all necessary components.

/10

Format, Style and Referencing

No attempt, or Very poor formatting Does not use the Harvard referencing style.

Fails to follow the assignment requirements; inconsistent margins, spacing and indentation; the neatness of assignment needs attention. Did not use Harvard referencing system.

Occasionally meets assignment requirements; generally consistent margins, spacing, and indentations; the assignment is neat but may have some format errors. Frequently used Harvard referencing system correctly.

Mostly meets assignment requirements. Margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; the essay is neat and correctly assembled. Used Harvard referencing system consistently and correctly, with a few errors.

Meets all assignment requirements and evidence attention to detail; all margins, spacing and indentations are correct; the essay is neat and correctly assembled with professional look. Used Harvard referencing system consistently and correctly.

Meets all assignment requirements and evidence the attention to detail; all margins, spacing and indentations are correct; the essay is neat and correctly assembled with professional look. Used Harvard referencing system consistently and correctly. More than ten current reliable sources (including peer review journal articles or scholarly books) are used.

/4

Total Points:

/30