Trusted by Students Everywhere
Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee

Human-written only.

24/7 Support

Anytime, anywhere.

Plagiarism Free

100% Original.

Expert Tutors

Masters & PhDs.

100% Confidential

Your privacy matters.

On-Time Delivery

Never miss a deadline.

Mohawk College HRM 01 Quiz #1 1)The two main sources of employment law in Canada are:   Statute law refers to:    Laws that have been passed by an act of Parliament or a provincial or federal legislation are most broadly conceptualized as which type of law?   What is a public bill?   Which of the following statements about the making of legislation is false   Which of the following statements is the most accurate description of common law?   In Toronto Electric Commissioners vs

Business Jun 23, 2021

Mohawk College

HRM 01

Quiz #1

1)The two main sources of employment law in Canada are:

 

  1. Statute law refers to:

 

  1.  Laws that have been passed by an act of Parliament or a provincial or federal legislation are most broadly conceptualized as which type of law?

 

  1. What is a public bill?

 

  1. Which of the following statements about the making of legislation is false

 

  1. Which of the following statements is the most accurate description of common law?

 

  1. In Toronto Electric Commissioners vs. Snider, the ruling by the court determined:

 

  1. Rights and freedoms protected by the Charter do not include which of the following:

 

  1. Section 33, the “notwithstanding clause”, means that:

 

  1. An example of a key Ontario employment statute is:

 

  1. What remedies can a plaintiff see in a torts lawsuit?

 

  1. The principle of "stare decisis" promotes:

 

  1. The role of the human rights tribunal is to:

 

  1. Which of the following are grounds for a judicial review:

 

  1. Two branches of the common law that affect employment are:

 

  1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms can be used to strike down employment laws that are found to contravene its requirements because:

 

  1. The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Vriend v. Alberta is notable because in that decision:

 

  1. As long as the contract clearly establishes that the parties intend their relationship to be one of independent contractor and principal, courts and tribunals will usually accept their characterization of the relationship.

 

  1. An individual who is hired for a specific period or task is automatically considered an independent contractor under the law

 

  1. In Jones v. Tsige, the Ontario Court of Appeal recognized a new tort of “intrusion upon seclusion.”

 

Archived Solution
Unlocked Solution

You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.

Already a member? Sign In
Important Note: This solution is from our archive and has been purchased by others. Submitting it as-is may trigger plagiarism detection. Use it for reference only.

For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.

Or get 100% fresh solution
Get Custom Quote
Secure Payment