Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee
Human-written only.
24/7 Support
Anytime, anywhere.
Plagiarism Free
100% Original.
Expert Tutors
Masters & PhDs.
100% Confidential
Your privacy matters.
On-Time Delivery
Never miss a deadline.
Walsingham Academy - SCIENCE 101 CHAPTER 14: THE GATHERING STORM, 1848-1860 TRUE/FALSE 1)Congress never passed the Wilmot Proviso
Walsingham Academy - SCIENCE 101
CHAPTER 14: THE GATHERING STORM, 1848-1860
TRUE/FALSE
1)Congress never passed the Wilmot Proviso.
- The Free-Soil party opposed the ideas of the Wilmot Proviso.
- By 1850, more than 90 percent of California’s population was male.
- In the mining frontier of the Far West, women often enjoyed greater opportunities than back east.
- As a result of the Compromise of 1850, California entered the Union as a free state.
- The author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin was Harriet Beecher Stowe.
- The Republican party was created in 1854 by the merger of several anti-slavery groups.
- The Pottawatomie Massacre was part of the conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces
in Kansas.
- James Buchanan’s great experience in public service helped him become one of the most successful presidents.
- The proposed Lecompton Constitution would make Kansas a free state.
- In 1857, the majority of the population in Kansas was anti-slavery.
- During his senatorial run against Douglas, Lincoln stated his belief in racial equality.
- Stephen Douglas was one of the most extreme pro-slavery and states’ rights advocates in the Democratic party.
- Through his execution, John Brown became a martyr for the anti-slavery cause.
- The Republican platform in 1860 promised to end slavery in the southern states.
- The states of the Deep South did not secede from the Union until Lincoln took office.
MULTIPLE CHOICE
- The Wilmot Proviso:
- would prohibit slavery in any lands acquired from Mexico
- passed both houses of Congress
- was opposed in Congress by Abraham Lincoln
- would extend the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific
- was clearly unconstitutional
- John C. Calhoun believed that the Wilmot Proviso:
- would help keep the Union together
- protected the interests of slaveholders
- violated property rights
- blamed the South for the Mexican–American War
- would never pass Congress
- The idea of popular sovereignty:
- solved the controversy over slavery’s extension
- would allow people in the territories to decide whether or not to permit slavery
- guaranteed slavery would spread westward
- allowed Oregon to enter the Union as a slave state
- was adopted by the Whigs in the 1848 election
- All of the following might have joined the Free-Soil party EXCEPT:
- supporters of the Wilmot Proviso d. Liberty party members
- admirers of Martin Van Buren e. “conscience Whigs”
- “cotton Whigs”
- The Free-Soil party stance on slavery:
- was endorsed by John C. Calhoun
- attracted Abraham Lincoln into their ranks
- led to the political downfall of Henry Clay
- infuriated John C. Calhoun
- opposed the Wilmot Proviso
- The 1848 presidential election:
- was won by Zachary Taylor
- was won by Lewis Cass
- was won by Van Buren
- was decided in the House of Representatives
- broke up the Whig party
- Which of the following is NOT true of Zachary Taylor?
- He owned more than one hundred slaves.
- He was a Mexican War hero.
- He opposed the extension of slavery into the new western territories.
- The “conscience Whigs” were his strongest supporters.
- He opposed the idea of secession.
- The discovery of gold in California did all of the following EXCEPT:
- spur a massive migration of gold seekers
- hasten the demise of the Indians
- encourage American dreams of a Pacific empire
- result in an infusion of gold into the U.S. economy that led to a prolonged period of national prosperity
- create a population with an equal balance of men and women
ANS: E
- In late 1849, Zachary Taylor proposed:
- California’s immediate entry as a free state
- war against the Mormons in Utah
- extension of slavery to the Pacific
- abolition of slavery in Washington, D.C.
- giving Texas back to Mexico
- President Zachary Taylor wanted to admit California as a state immediately because he:
- was anti-slavery and California had voted on a free-state constitution
- was pro-slavery and California had voted on a slave-state constitution
- wished to bypass the divisive issue of slavery in the territories
- was afraid Mexico would make new claims on the area since gold had been discovered there
- was persuaded to do so by his overwhelmingly northern cabinet
- During the great congressional debate over the Compromise of 1850:
- John Calhoun endorsed all of Henry Clay’s proposals
- President Taylor died
- Henry Clay pushed for the compromise and national harmony
- Jefferson Davis emerged as a voice of moderation
- Daniel Webster made an impassioned argument for secession
- What was the impact of President Taylor’s death?
- It strengthened the chance for compromise over slavery in 1850.
- It put pro-slavery Franklin Pierce in the White House.
- It put anti-slavery William H. Seward in the White House.
- It prevented California from gaining admission into the Union.
- It brought great relief to the nation, because he had started the current sectional crisis.
- Given the bitterness of the congressional debate, why was Stephen Douglas successful in getting the Compromise of 1850 passed?
- He dropped the question of the slave trade in the District of Columbia.
- He could depend on a sympathy vote from supporters of deceased President Taylor.
- His support for popular sovereignty allowed many abolitionist senators to vote with him.
-
- He split the issues into separate bills.
- He was in better health and was more charismatic than Clay.
- The Compromise of 1850:
- gave Texas more territory d. ended slavery in Washington, D.C.
- admitted Utah as a slave state e. strengthened the fugitive slave law
- postponed California statehood
ANS: E
- Why did the new Fugitive Slave Act outrage abolitionists?
- It offered a strong temptation to kidnap free blacks in northern free states.
- It required the licensing of slave catchers.
- It guaranteed fugitive slaves a jury trial.
- It allowed northern states to become slave states.
- It reintroduced the legal international slave trade.
- Why did Uncle Tom’s Cabin outrage slave owners?
- It was authored by Harriet Tubman.
- It showed how the brutal realities of slavery harmed everyone associated with it.
- It convinced many poor southern whites to oppose slavery.
- It started the Civil War.
- It was an objective description of life under slavery.
- Author Harriet Beecher Stowe’s background was indicative of the abolitionist movement’s:
- weak moral compass
- symbolic support of the Fugitive Slave Act
- powerful religious underpinnings
- willingness to accept slavery in some modified form
- gradually weakening strength
- The election of 1852:
- saw both major parties denounce the Compromise of 1850
- resulted in a second term for Millard Fillmore
- saw the disappearance of the Free-Soil party
- was dominated by the current economic depression
- was won by Franklin Pierce
ANS: E
- What position did both the Democrats and Whigs support in the 1852 presidential election?
- a ban on the expansion of slavery into the territories
- support of the Compromise of 1850
- women’s suffrage
- repeal of the Fugitive Slave Act
- use of the popular vote rather than Electoral College to determine the election’s winner
- Stephen Douglas’s proposed Kansas-Nebraska Act:
- might allow slavery in Kansas and Nebraska
- strengthened the Missouri Compromise
- showed his enthusiastic support of slavery
- strengthened his presidential prospects
- would promote construction of a transcontinental rail line along a southern route
- Why did so many northerners, including the so-called Independent Democrats, oppose the Kansas- Nebraska Act?
- They opposed the admission of both territories as states.
- The act repealed the fugitive slave law.
- The act would bring about immediate abolition.
- The act repealed the Missouri Compromise.
- They opposed the law because it did not embrace “popular sovereignty.”
- Passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was a victory for:
- abolitionists
- immigrant groups in America
- the concept of popular sovereignty
-
- southerners who wanted a transcontinental railroad to run west from New Orleans
- the preservation of the Union
- Why did the Whig party collapse?
- It no longer had sufficient numbers of people voting for it.
- It opposed slavery.
- The strain of the Kansas-Nebraska Act pushed northern and southern members toward joining different parties.
- The Republican party defeated the major Whig candidates in the 1852 election.
- Its economic policies were perceived as too socialist.
- The Republican party reflected a combination of all of the following groups EXCEPT:
- northern Whigs d. cotton Whigs
- anti-slavery Democrats e. abolitionists
- Free-Soilers
- How did passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act impact the settlement of Kansas?
- The vagaries left about the status of slavery discouraged settlement.
- Popular sovereignty encouraged violence-prone supporters and opponents of slavery to flood Kansas.
- It ensured that Kansas would be admitted into the Union as a free state with a population
deeply committed to abolition.
-
- It made Kansas a slave state with a majority population of slaveholders.
- This is a trick question. The act had no impact on settlement of Kansas.
- All of the following statements about John Brown are true EXCEPT:
- He was the father of 20 children.
- He and his followers were responsible for the Pottawatomie Massacre.
- He believed blacks deserved both liberty and full social equality.
- He led an unsuccessful raid on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry.
- He was fanatically committed to fight to protect the institution of slavery.
ANS: E
- Preston Brooks’s caning of Charles Sumner:
- took place in Kansas
- ended Brooks’s career in Congress
- showed that both North and South rejected political extremists
- was totally without motive or provocation
- made Brooks a hero in much of the South
ANS: E
- In 1856, the Republicans:
- declared their opposition to slavery
- nominated William Seward for president
- stood for states’ rights
- strongly condemned the nativist platform of the American party
- campaigned vigorously all over the country
- In the 1856 election, the Democrats supported all of the following EXCEPT:
- the Kansas-Nebraska Act
- vigorous enforcement of the fugitive slave law
- religious liberty
- the reinstitution of the Missouri Compromise
- no congressional interference with slavery in the states or territories
- A major reason the Democrat James Buchanan won the 1856 election was that:
- the Republicans were mired in political scandal
- the Democrats were the only remaining national party
- the northern Whigs threw their support to the Democrats
- slavery and sectional divisions were not an issue in the election
- the Republicans did not have a candidate to run against him
- On what legal basis did Dred Scott sue for his freedom?
- He had married a free woman.
- The physical abuse he suffered was illegal.
- He argued that slavery was unconstitutional.
- He claimed that living for extended periods in areas where slavery was forbidden made him free.
- His father was a free man.
- What did the Supreme Court rule in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
- Slaves who were taken to free states would be considered free.
- Slaves who were taken to free territories would be considered free.
- The Missouri Compromise was still legally binding.
- Blacks did not have citizenship and therefore lacked legal standing.
- State bans on slavery did not violate the property rights of masters.
- The Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision:
- gave Dred Scott his freedom
- was applauded by the Republicans
- implied that the Missouri Compromise had been unconstitutional
- guaranteed the future admission of slave states
- recognized that free blacks were U.S. citizens
- Why did Kansas’s Lecompton Constitution become so controversial?
- It banned slavery even though an overwhelming majority of residents supported it.
- It banned slavery but provided an exception to existing resident slave owners.
- It allowed slavery even though a majority of residents opposed it.
- It allowed each county in Kansas to vote on the legality of slavery.
- It advocated for Kansas independence rather than statehood.
- Why did President Buchanan support the Lecompton Constitution?
- He opposed the spread of slavery, and the constitution banned it from Kansas.
- He was born in Lecompton and always supported his hometown.
- He was politically dependent on northern congressmen, who also supported the constitution.
- He was dependent on southern congressmen, who also supported the constitution.
- He had no strong position, but his advisers insisted he support it.
- The Panic of 1857:
- was the worst depression in American history
- ended sectional bickering
- started the Civil War
- was triggered by the violence in Kansas
- strengthened southern confidence in its cotton economy
ANS: E
- Abraham Lincoln:
- opposed the further spread of slavery
- supported black equality
- would abolish slavery wherever it existed
- was a military hero
- was born in 1810
- The Lincoln-Douglas debates:
- saw Douglas abandon popular sovereignty
- bolstered Lincoln’s presidential prospects in 1860
- clinched Lincoln’s election to the U.S. Senate
- saw Lincoln state his belief in racial equality
- saw Lincoln endorse the Dred Scott ruling
- John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry was intended to:
- start a civil war
- unify the Republican party
- provoke slave insurrections
- prove John Brown was God’s agent
- provoke a fight with the U.S. Army
- John Brown targeted Harpers Ferry, Virginia, because:
- it had a large slave population
- it was the site of a federal arsenal
- it was an important railroad center
- many abolitionists lived in the area
- it had banks with large deposits
- John Brown’s raid:
- ended bloodlessly
- succeeded
- was of minor importance
- set off a panic throughout the slaveholding South
- was condemned by abolitionists
- As the election of 1860 approached, the Democratic party:
- renominated Buchanan
- was silent on the issue of slavery
- condemned the Kansas-Nebraska Act
- was dominated by southern extremists
- broke up into northern and southern wings
ANS: E
- The Republican party platform supported all of the following in 1860 EXCEPT:
- a transcontinental railroad
- a higher protective tariff
- no further extension of slavery
- John Brown’s raid
- free farms on federal lands out west
- All of the following were presidential nominees in 1860 EXCEPT:
- William Seward d. John Breckinridge
- John Bell e. Stephen Douglas
- Abraham Lincoln
- Lincoln won the election of 1860 by:
- appealing to fear
- sweeping the free states
- carrying the biggest states in both North and South
- massive voter fraud
- changing his position on slavery
- The states of the Confederate States of America seceded after Lincoln’s election because:
- Lincoln promised to abolish slavery immediately after taking office
- Lincoln was pushing for an invasion of the South
- the southern secessionists were convinced that Lincoln would move against slavery despite his assurances otherwise
- the southern secessionists planned to invade the North and impose slavery on the entire
Union
-
- the southern secessionists believed that Jefferson Davis had won the 1860 election but was denied the office through fraud
- In response to secession, President Buchanan:
- said he supported it
- declared martial law
- abandoned Fort Sumter
- did practically nothing
- let Lincoln take office ahead of schedule
- The Crittenden Compromise proposed to:
- outlaw slavery in the United States after 1865
- guarantee continuance of slavery in the states where it then existed
- guarantee that all new territories would be open to slavery
- give slaves full representation rather than allow them to count for only three fifths of a person
- provide a federal slave code for the western territories
MATCHING
49 Match each description with the item below.
-
- was a candidate for the presidency in the 1860 election
- led Pottawatomie Massacre
- elected president of the Confederate States of America
- died in July 1850
- caned Charles Sumner
- the “Little Giant” who succeeded in getting the Compromise of 1850 passed by breaking it into separate proposals
- argued that Congress needed to protect the right of slave owners to take their property into
the territories
-
- was the chief justice for Dred Scott case
- was the 1848 Free-Soil presidential candidate
- was the president who supported the Compromise of 1850
- Preston Brooks
- John Brown
- John C. Calhoun
- Jefferson Davis
- Stephen A. Douglas
- Millard Fillmore
- John Bell
- Roger B. Taney
- Zachary Taylor
- Martin Van Buren
Expert Solution
PFA
Archived Solution
You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.
For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.





