CMIT 326 Project 3 In this course, you will assume the role of an IT team member for a fictitious company, Don & Associates

CMIT 326 Project 3

In this course, you will assume the role of an IT team member for a fictitious company, Don & Associates. This will help you learn about an IT professional's role and how to develop solutions on the job.

Don & Associates is a financial consulting company that provide services to small- and medium-sized companies. The company operates networks and servers, as well as other physical technological infrastructure.

Don & Associates is looking to expand its services and locations, but the owner of the company is worried about the cost of acquiring additional equipment and is also concerned about maintenance and space. The owner is looking for an innovative solution that will reduce the operational cost of expansion.

Assignment 3: Proof of Concept Report—Your task is to develop a proof of concept by building a virtual machine on the AWS cloud platform to host your current infrastructure. For the purpose of the lab, you will use Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) to create your own VPC and launch a web server to host the company's web server. You will also create security groups for an EC2 instance, configure and customize the EC2 instance to run the web server, and launch it into the VPC.

Rubric Name: Project 3: Proof of Concept Report

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Exceeds Performance Requirements

Meets Performance Requirements

Approaches Performance Requirements

Does Not Meet Performance Requirements

Criterion Score

1.1.3: Present ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.

5 points

Presents a logical flow of ideas that is easily identifiable and completely appropriate to the task.

4.25 points

Presents ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.

3.75 points

Attempts to present ideas, but the logic is not clear and/or not appropriate to the task.

0 points

Does not present ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.

/ 5

1.1.4: Explain the relationship between the ideas presented to enhance clarity and comprehension.

7 points

Explains the relationship between the ideas presented in a thorough manner to enhance clarity and comprehension.

5.95 points

Explains the relationship between the ideas presented to enhance clarity and comprehension.

5.25 points

Attempts to explain the relationship between the ideas presented, but there may be gaps in clarity and comprehension.

0 points

Does not explains the relationship between the ideas presented to enhance clarity and comprehension.

/ 7

2.1.1: Identify the issue or problem under consideration.

7 points

Identifies the issue or problem under consideration in a clear and thorough manner.

5.95 points

Identifies the issue or problem under consideration.

5.25 points

Attempts to Identify the issue or problem under consideration, but there is a lack of clarity or thoroughness.

0 points

Does not identify the issue or problem under consideration.

/ 7

2.1.2: Describe the context surrounding the issue or problem.

7 points

Describes the context surrounding the issue or problem clearly and accurately.

5.95 points

Describes the context surrounding the issue or problem.

5.25 points

Attempts to describe the context surrounding the issue or problem.

0 points

Does not describe the context surrounding the issue or problem.

/ 7

2.2.3: Explain the assumptions underlying viewpoints, solutions, or conclusions.

7 points

Explains the assumptions underlying viewpoints, solutions, or conclusions in a comprehensive and accurate manner.

5.95 points

Explains the assumptions underlying viewpoints, solutions or conclusions.

5.25 points

Attempts to explain the assumptions underlying viewpoints, solutions or conclusions, but the explanation lacks clarity.

0 points

Does not explain the assumptions underlying viewpoints, solutions, or conclusions.

/ 7

2.3.4: Address alternative viewpoints, perspectives, and methods.

7 points

Addresses alternative viewpoints, perspectives, and methods accurately and appropriately.

5.95 points

Addresses alternative viewpoints, perspectives, and methods.

5.25 points

Attempts to address alternative viewpoints, perspectives, and methods, but there are issues with the accuracy and/or appropriateness.

0 points

Does not address alternative viewpoints, perspectives, and methods.

/ 7

11.1.3: Install software.

20 points

Installs software that is fully functional and appropriate for the given requirements.

17 points

Installs software that is appropriate for the given requirements.

15 points

Installs software that may not be fully functional and/or appropriate for the given requirements.

0 points

Does not install software.

/ 20

11.2.1: Configure technology according to stakeholder specifications and requirements.

20 points

Configures technology accurately and thoroughly to meet stakeholder specifications and requirements.

17 points

Configures technology that meets stakeholder specifications and requirements.

15 points

Attempts to configure technology according to stakeholder specifications and requirements.

0 points

Does not configure technology that meets stakeholder specifications and requirements.

/ 20

13.1.1: Create documentation appropriate to the stakeholder.

20 points

Creates thorough and accurate IT documentation that exceeds requirements.

17 points

Creates IT documentation that meets requirements.

15 points

Creates IT documentation that lacks detail and/or does not fully meet requirements.

0 points

Does not create appropriate IT documentation.

/ 20

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

/ 100