"EFN405 Applied Economics Semester 1 2017 Assessment: Take Home Exam To be submitted via TurnItIn in EFN405 Blackboard I. Background of Case On 2009 Fiscal Stimulus \u201c\u2026 Governments everywhere are discussing or implementing \u201cstimulus\u201d packages \u2026I doubt Australia need much fiscal stimulus, except that which improves national productivity and competitiveness \u2026\u201d (\u201cWe need stimulus that boosts productivity, not \u2018sugar hits\u2019\u201d Henry Thornton, The Australian Feb 3 2009) \u201c\u2026Kelvin Rudd\u2019s $42 billion National Building and Jobs Plan is likely to disappoint \u2026 Most of this $12.7 billion handout will be saved \u2026 What\u2019s spent will have \u201cno long-run benefits \u2026 (I)t has gone to capital works that will not have big supply-side payoffs \u2026\u201d (\u201cKeynes out of drawer\u201d Michael Stutchbury, The Weekend Australian Feb 14-15 2009) Critics have argued against the Australian government\u2019s fiscal stimulus in 2009 claiming that it may not be effective in the short term and has no benefits in the long term. You have been"

Trusted by Students Everywhere

Google USA

Why Choose Us?

0% AI Guarantee

Human-written only.

24/7 Support

Anytime, anywhere.

Plagiarism Free

100% Original.

Expert Tutors

Masters & PhDs.

100% Confidential

Your privacy matters.

On-Time Delivery

Never miss a deadline.

EFN405 Applied Economics Semester 1 2017 Assessment: Take Home Exam To be submitted via TurnItIn in EFN405 Blackboard I

Economics Feb 18, 2021

EFN405 Applied Economics Semester 1 2017

Assessment: Take Home Exam

To be submitted via TurnItIn in EFN405 Blackboard

I. Background of Case

On 2009 Fiscal Stimulus

“… Governments everywhere are discussing or implementing “stimulus” packages …I doubt Australia need much fiscal stimulus, except that which improves national productivity and competitiveness …”

(“We need stimulus that boosts productivity, not ‘sugar hits’” Henry Thornton, The Australian Feb 3 2009)

“…Kelvin Rudd’s $42 billion National Building and Jobs Plan is likely to disappoint … Most of this $12.7 billion handout will be saved … What’s spent will have “no long-run benefits … (I)t has gone to capital works that will not have big supply-side payoffs …”

(“Keynes out of drawer” Michael Stutchbury, The Weekend Australian Feb 14-15 2009)

Critics have argued against the Australian government’s fiscal stimulus in 2009 claiming that it may not be effective in the short term and has no benefits in the long term. You have been tasked by the House of Representatives Economics Committee to answer the following questions:

Using data drawn from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), present either

Tables or Diagrams showing Australia’s economic growth from 2007 to 2015. Describe the trend and examine the cyclical movements. (10 marks)

Discuss and analyse the effectiveness of the fiscal and monetary policies employed in 2009, illustrating with aggregate demand-aggregate supply models. In your discussion, critically evaluate the above arguments put forward by Thornton (2009) and Stutchbury (2009). Discussion and analysis must be supported and referenced using peer-reviewed journal articles. (30 marks)

Expert Solution

Please use this google drive link to download the answer file.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12tkIhMZzmsNZZxSPDHsXLMFe-a2s2iEV/view?usp=sharing

Note: If you have any trouble in viewing/downloading the answer from the given link, please use this below guide to understand the whole process.
https://helpinhomework.org/blog/how-to-obtain-answer-through-googledrive-link

Archived Solution

Unlocked Solution

You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.

Already a member? Sign In

Important Note: This solution is from our archive and has been purchased by others. Submitting it as-is may trigger plagiarism detection. Use it for reference only.

For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.

Or get 100% fresh solution

Get Custom Quote