Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / IHP 420 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric   Overview One of the most important objectives of this course is for you to be able to relate the theories in the readings and discussions to situations in real life

IHP 420 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric   Overview One of the most important objectives of this course is for you to be able to relate the theories in the readings and discussions to situations in real life

Law

IHP 420 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

 

Overview

One of the most important objectives of this course is for you to be able to relate the theories in the readings and discussions to situations in real life. We will develop these critical thinking skills each week via the discussion boards and short writing assignments, which will culminate in the final project, a medical malpractice case study

 

The purpose of a case study in general is to apply what you learned to a real-life or hypothetical situation where you analyze, test, and propose solutions to the case. You may have a problem to solve and be asked to present potential solutions. Or you may have a situation to analyze and describe why (or why not) certain events were effective or successful. In processing a case study, you will have to apply research, reasoning, critical thinking, and analytical skills to identify underlying problems, causes, and/or related factors and make decisions.

 

For the medical malpractice case study, you will prepare a paper discussing a medical malpractice case using the IRAC (issue, rule, analysis, conclusion) formula. You will discuss any relevant ethical theories involved and analyze the outcome, applying legal concepts from the course. 

 

You should be thinking about your case and start your research by Module Three. By Module Five, you should finalize your choice of a reported case for your project. In the Module Five journal activity, you will be asked to briefly discuss your chosen case and provide an outline for your project. The final project is due at the end of Module Seven

 

In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

 

  • Analyze why knowledge of the legal system is important for healthcare professionals, including the distinctions between the law, ethics, and bioethics
  • Compare and contrast ethical theories and discuss decision-making models applicable to healthcare providers
  • Examine the legal environment in healthcare, including the physician-patient relationship, medical records and patient confidentiality, and professional liability and medical malpractice
  • Explore the laws impacting the delivery of healthcare, including HIPAA, the False Claims Act, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and laws impacting the workplace
  • Analyze the role of professional regulation, the standard of care, and codes of ethics in healthcare providers’ accountability to self, their profession, their patients, and the public
  • Analyze specific legal, ethical, and bioethical issues faced by healthcare administrators, providers, and researchers, including protection of life, the right to self-determination, and end-of-life issues

 

 

Prompt

The first step of the project is to locate a medical malpractice case that interests you. The case can involve malpractice or negligence claims against any type of healthcare provider—for example, a doctor, nurse, dentist, or chiropractor or an institutional provider such as a hospital, nursing home, or rehab facility. The case you choose must be from a published decision of the court (rather than a case reported in a secondary source, such as a newspaper or internet article). 

 

Published decisions are primary sources of law that create precedent for other courts to follow in similar cases. For more information about judicial decisions, and for help on where to find them, visit the Library of Congress Law Library.

 

Review these malpractice decisions to get familiar with the structure and format of a typical court decision:

 

 

These cases were found by searching the New York Official Reports website using the terms “medical malpractice” and “wrongful death.” To locate the published court decisions in your state, browse the resources available at the Library of Congress Law Library or visit FindLaw’s Cases and Codes section, which contains resources and links for cases by state. 

 

It is easier to find medical malpractice cases in state court as opposed to federal court, so you may want to start with cases in your local state court. As you get further into your research, you will discover that some court opinions are short, and some are much longer and contain significantly more detail. For this assignment, it is important to choose a case that not only interests you but also contains a detailed description of the facts and circumstances so you have enough information for your analysis. The two examples provided above are good samples of the kind of opinion you should try to find. When researching cases, make sure the one you ultimately select contains enough information about the case to address each of the bullet points below. Your paper should contain three parts:

 

  • Part I: Introduction

In this part, describe your case, including the parties, the facts, and the claims asserted.

 

  • Part II: Analysis

This part is your analysis and should make up the majority of your paper. This section should be written in the IRAC format. Click here for a description of the IRAC model. Your analysis should discuss the evidence on both sides of the case and the defenses asserted by the defendant healthcare provider. This section should also identify and analyze the ethical theories involved and how they did or did not impact the decision. 

 

  • Part III: Variation

In this part, discuss how and why the outcome would have changed if the facts or evidence had been different. For example, if the plaintiff won the case, discuss a defense that, if available to the defendant, would have changed the outcome (for example, if the defendant could prove the plaintiff filed his claim after the statute of limitations had expired).  

 

 

Final Project Rubric

Guidelines for Submission: Your submission must be five to eight pages in length (in addition to the title page and reference list) and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use APA style for citations. 

 

This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.

 

Critical Elements

Exemplary (100%)

Proficient (85%)

Needs Improvement (55%)

Not Evident (0%)

Value

Main Elements

Includes all of the main elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element

Includes most of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element

Includes some of the main elements and requirements

Does not include any of the main elements or requirements

25

Inquiry and Analysis

Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of multiple concepts

Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of some concepts

Provides analysis that demonstrates minimal understanding of concepts

Does not provide analysis

20 

Integration and Application

All of the course concepts are correctly applied 

Most of the course concepts are correctly applied

Some of the course concepts are correctly applied 

Does not correctly apply any of the course concepts 

10

Critical Thinking

Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples

Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence

Draws logical conclusions but does not defend with evidence

Does not draw logical conclusions

20

Research 

Effectively incorporates many scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

Effectively incorporates some scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

Incorporates very few scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

Does not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

15

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10

 

 

 

 

Earned Total

100%

 

IRAC

 

What is IRAC?

  • Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion 
  • A method for organizing legal analysis so the reader can follow your argument to its conclusion

 

How do I use IRAC?

As an example, we will look at whether someone can sue for battery as a result of inhaling second-hand smoke.  The issue we will look at is whether there is contact with another person, which is required for a battery claim.

 

Issue

First state the question you are trying to answer (what brought the parties into court).  This can be in the form of a question or a statement.  For example:

  • “There is an issue as to whether contact occurred when the plaintiff inhaled the second-hand smoke.”
  • “Does contact occur when one inhales second-hand smoke created by another?”

 

Rule

State the rule of law or legal principle.  This may require stating the elements to establish a claim.

  • “To prove a case for battery the plaintiff must establish the following elements: an act, intent, contact, causation, and harm.”
  • “The offense of battery requires contact with the plaintiff’s person.”

 

Analysis

This is where you discuss the facts, apply them to the law and explain how you will arrive at your conclusion.  You may cite other cases, discuss policy implications, and discuss cases that run counter to your conclusion.  If you are analyzing a case that has already been decided by the court, discuss how the court arrived at its decision, balancing arguments from both sides.  

You can use other cases, analogizing and distinguishing, and policy (for example, the goals of tort law) to work your way to a conclusion. For example:

o “In Howe v. Ahn, the court held that noxious bus fumes inhaled by a passerby constitute harmful and offensive contact.  Although the court has not extended this holding to a case involving second-hand smoke, numerous cases have likened second-hand smoke to air pollution (for example, Fox v. Abernathy).  Policy considerations also favor finding contact in the present case.  If one can prove harm as a result of inhaling second-hand smoke, it is better for the smoker to compensate the victim than burden the state.”

 

Conclusion

State the outcome of your analysis.  This can be a prediction of how the court may rule or a statement of the court’s decision.    

o “The court is likely to find that harmful contact occurs when a smoker releases second-hand smoke into the air and that air is inhaled by a bystander.”

Visit the selected resources or other sources for locating reported case law. Please make sure these questions are addressed in the journal.

 

1.Think about the kind of case you would like to analyze.

2.Create a journal entry outlining your preliminary thoughts for the project.

3.What type of provider (hospital, nursing home, doctor, dentist, etc.) will be involved in your case?

4.What kind of fact pattern are you looking for?

5.Do you want to explore a local case or a nationally publicized story?

6.Where will you find your case? What research have you done so far?

7.What kinds of questions do you want to answer?

 

Your journal entry should be at least 300 words. APA . Outside sources are not required. sources can be found in attachment.

 

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

3.49 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE