Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / In Module 3, you submitted your Literature Review Draft, building on your annotated bibliography and supporting your topic/research question

In Module 3, you submitted your Literature Review Draft, building on your annotated bibliography and supporting your topic/research question

Statistics

In Module 3, you submitted your Literature Review Draft, building on your annotated bibliography and supporting your topic/research question. You also received feedback from your instructor. Be sure to make any revisions before submitting your final Literature Review to this activity.

Submit

Before you begin, read the Literature Review & Report Guidelines. This will give you step-by-step guidance for creating your literature review. 

Note: The rubric for this assignment is the same rubric that was used for the draft submission. Your final review is worth 15% of your final grade.


Submit your Literature Review by the end of the module week. Be sure to address all the required elements listed thoroughly. Your document is required to be in current APA format and free of grammar and spelling errors.

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

 You are submitting your paper as a draft to Turnitin so that you can check the originality report, but the paper will not be stored in the Turnitin repository at this time.

 This activity supports Module Objective 2 and Learning Outcome 2.

Rubric

RSCH 202 M5 Literature Review Final Rubric

RSCH 202 M5 Literature Review Final Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Clearly states a specific problem, gives a brief, succinct background, and indicates why solving it is important.

5.0 pts

Superior

4.0 pts

Proficient

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

2.0 pts

Poor

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review-Organization

Structure is intuitive and sufficiently grounded to each of the key constructs and variables of the proposed study. The review was organized using subheadings. The review was suitably organized considering the contents of the selected articles.

20.0 pts

Superior

17.0 pts

Proficient

14.0 pts

Satisfactory

11.0 pts

Poor

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review-Content

Narrative integrates critical and logical details from appropriate literature. Key constructs and variables were connected. Attention is given to different perspectives and opinion vs. evidence. The findings and results of articles were thoughtfully compared, contrasted and/or connected to each other. The review concluded with a summary of the knowledge found from this review and related the knowledge gain to the inquiry question.

20.0 pts

Superior

17.0 pts

Proficient

14.0 pts

Satisfactory

11.0 pts

Poor

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Question

Articulates a clear, reasonable, and succinct research question or questions. Connection with the literature review is clear and obvious.

10.0 pts

Superior

8.0 pts

Proficient

7.0 pts

Satisfactory

2.0 pts

Poor

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework

Framework is solidly grounded in the literature review. Connections are clear and accurate. Relationships among variables are clearly and accurately explained. Theory underlying the relations is clearly explained.

20.0 pts

Superior

17.0 pts

Proficient

14.0 pts

Satisfactory

11.0 pts

Poor

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHypothesis

Hypotheses are clearly stated using appropriate language and/or symbols. Relationship between hypotheses and theoretical framework is clear. Hypotheses are expressed in the form of testable statements.

5.0 pts

Superior

4.0 pts

Proficient

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

2.0 pts

Poor

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

At least 7 appropriate references were used and each specifically related to the question. Standards of APA formatting were followed with very few errors.

10.0 pts

Superior

8.0 pts

Proficient

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

2.0 pts

Poor

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and Timeliness

Consistently applied standards of English composition. There were no grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors and transitional phrases were used to guide the reader throughout the text. Assignment submitted on time.

5.0 pts

Superior

4.0 pts

Proficient

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

2.0 pts

Poor

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting

Consistently applied APA guidelines in regards to citations, references, headings, table of contents, page numbers, and running headers

5.0 pts

Superior

4.0 pts

Proficient

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

2.0 pts

Poor

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE