Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee
Human-written only.
24/7 Support
Anytime, anywhere.
Plagiarism Free
100% Original.
Expert Tutors
Masters & PhDs.
100% Confidential
Your privacy matters.
On-Time Delivery
Never miss a deadline.
The following is a payoff matrix showing profit in millions of dollars when two companies simultaneously decide on various advertising budgets ($1 million, $2 million, or $3 million): a
The following is a payoff matrix showing profit in millions of dollars when two companies simultaneously decide on various advertising budgets ($1 million, $2 million, or $3 million):
a. In the first round of strategy elimination (when all three possible budgets are under consideration), which ad budget would the companies exclude?
b. After the first round of elimination (previous question), would either company make a second-round elimination?
c. What would be the likely outcome of this simultaneous advertising decision (i.e. what ad budget would each company end up choosing)?
|
Pizza Hut |
||||
|
$1 mill |
$2 mill |
$3 mill |
||
|
$1 mill |
$185 / $230 |
160 / 225 |
135 / 240 |
|
|
Papa Johns |
$2 mill |
210 / 225 |
170 / 210 |
145 / 215 |
|
$3 mill |
200 / 195 |
175 / 200 |
140 / 210 |
Expert Solution
Answer:
Given,
The following is a payoff matrix showing profit in millions of dollars when two companies simultaneously decide on various advertising budgets ($1 million, $2 million, or $3 million):
| $1 mill | $2 mill | $3 mill | |
| $1 mill | 185 / 230 | 160 / 225 | 135 / 240 |
| $2 mill | 210 / 225 | 170 / 210 | 145 / 215 |
| $3 mill | 200 / 195 | 175 / 200 | 140 / 210 |
Papa Johns is the row player and Pizza Hut is the column player. The first term of each cell represents the pay-off of Papa Johns from a particular strategy and the second term represents the pay-off of Pizza Hut. We indicate the optimal choices by underlinning them.
a. In the first round of strategy elimination:
- When Papa Johns chooses $ 1 mill , Pizza Hut chooses $ 3 mill because it gives them a higher pay-off. (240>230>225)
- When Papa Johns chooses $ 2 mill , Pizza Hut chooses $ 1 mill. ( 225 > 215 > 210)
- When Papa Johns chooses $ 3 mill , Pizza Hut chooses $3 mill. (210>200>195)
Thus , Pizza Hut never chooses $2 mill irrespective of what Papa Johns chooses. $2 mill is a strictly dominated strategy for Pizza Hut and will be eliminated in the first round by the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies.
The pay-off matrix now becomes :
| $1 mill | $3 mill | |
| $1 mill | 185 , 230 | 135 , 240 |
| $2 mill | 210 , 225 | 145 , 215 |
| $3 mill | 200 , 195 | 140 , 210 |
b. Company make a second-round elimination, After the first round of elimination:
- When Pizza Hut chooses $1 mill , Papa Johns chooses $ 2 mill because it gives them a higher pay-off. (210>200>185)
- When Pizza Hut chooses $3 mill , Papa Johns chooses $ 2 mill. ( 145>140>135)
Thus , Papa Johns always chooses $2 mill irrespective of what Pizza Hut chooses. So , $2 mill is a strictly dominant strategy for Papa Johns. The other two strategies ( $1 mill and $3 mill ) are both strictly dominated strategies for Papa Johns and will be eliminated by the expected iteration of strictly dominated strategies.
The pay-off matrix now becomes :
| $ 1 mill | $ 3 mill | ||
| $ 2 mill | 210 , 225 | 145 , 215 |
- When Papa Johns chooses $ 2 mill , Pizza Hut will choose $ 1 mill because it gives them a higher pay-off. ( 225>215)
Thus , the pure strategy Nash Equilibrium for this game is ($2 mill , $1 mill ) and the pay-offs would be (210,225)
c. simultaneous advertising decision:
Thus , the most likely outcome of this simultaneous advertising decision is that Papa Johns will choose $2 mill and Pizza Hut will choose $1 mill and they would end up getting a pay-off of $210 and $225 respectively.
Archived Solution
You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.
For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.





