Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee
Human-written only.
24/7 Support
Anytime, anywhere.
Plagiarism Free
100% Original.
Expert Tutors
Masters & PhDs.
100% Confidential
Your privacy matters.
On-Time Delivery
Never miss a deadline.
See Hint Assuming Ami has a typical reaction, do you think she is more likely to play BijongBall in the first case (when the pitch is "you can win 35% of the time") or the second case (when the game is advertised as "you have only a 65
See Hint Assuming Ami has a typical reaction, do you think she is more likely to play BijongBall in the first case (when the pitch is "you can win 35% of the time") or the second case (when the game is advertised as "you have only a 65.00% chance of getting zero")? Ami is being affected by an) framing effect barker fallacy anchoring effect gambling bias 10 OF 13 QUESTIONS COMPLETED SUBMIT ANSWER
Expert Solution
Size of bet per grid number = Jackpot / Numbers in the grid
= $ 10,000 / (10 X 10) = $100 per option
Part 1
When 35 numbers selected
Bet expenses = 35 X size = $3500
Expected win = 35% X $10,000 = $3500
Expected payoff = Bet expenses - expected winn = $3500 - $3500 = 0
Part 2
65 numbers not selected = 35 numbers selected
Bet expenses = 35 X size = $3500
Expected win = 35% X $10,000 = $3500
Expected payoff = Bet expenses - expected winn = $3500 - $3500 = 0
Part 3
Ami is more likely to play in the first case as 35% winning chances seems to be very high in the first instance. On the other hand 65% losing chances as in the second game looks very high and therefore a show stopper for the casino guests.
Part 4
First alternative is the correct one as the framing effect is a phsycological bias where people decide on options based on whether the options are presented positively or negatively.
Archived Solution
You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.
For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.





