Homework answers / question archive / Stated in even stronger terms, Singer believes that if we don’t take the initiative to donate a significant portion of our income to help alleviate world hunger, then we are guilty of the moral equivalent of murder

Stated in even stronger terms, Singer believes that if we don’t take the initiative to donate a significant portion of our income to help alleviate world hunger, then we are guilty of the moral equivalent of murder

Writing

Share With

Stated in even stronger terms, Singer believes that if we don’t take the initiative to donate a significant portion of our income to help alleviate world hunger, then we are guilty of the moral equivalent of murder. Do you agree or disagree with this conclusion? Why or why not? If not, what counter arguments would you propose to Singer? How do you think he would respond?