Homework answers / question archive / Ethics and Duty Address the following in a 1–2-page paper: Explain deontology and the role of the categorical imperative in determining one’s ethical duty

Ethics and Duty Address the following in a 1–2-page paper: Explain deontology and the role of the categorical imperative in determining one’s ethical duty

Management

Share With

---

Ethics and Duty

Address the following in a 1–2-page paper:

1. Explain deontology and the role of the categorical imperative in determining one’s ethical duty.
2. Illustrate your understanding of this ethical theory with a concrete example of an ethical dilemma.
3. Discuss an ethical theory that would take a different approach
4. Be sure to explain and discuss any key ideas with supporting citations to the textbook and online lectures in correct APA format. Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.
5. Review and comment on the posts of other students and the instructor by the end of the week.

Rubric Assessment

Top of Form

 

 

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Response

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F-D: 1-27)

27 points

27 %

Satisfactory (C: 28-31)

31 points

31 %

Proficient (B: 32-35)

35 points

35 %

Exemplary (A: 36-40)

40 points

40 %

Criterion Score

Quality of Initial Posting

Add Feedback

No initial posting exists to evaluate.

 

The information provided is inaccurate, not focused on the assignment’s topic, and/or does not answer the question(s) fully. Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and/or inadequate preparation.

 

The information provided is accurate, giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. A basic understanding is when you are able to describe the terms and concepts covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may not include complete development of all aspects of the assignment.

 

The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered. A good understanding is when you are able to explain the terms and topics covered. Initial posting demonstrates sincere reflection and addresses most aspects of the assignment, although all concepts may not be fully developed.

 

The information provided is accurate, providing an in-depth, well thought-out understanding of the topic(s) covered. An in-depth understanding provides an analysis of the information, synthesizing what is learned from the course/assigned readings.

 

/ 40

/ 40

*

Criterion score has been overridden

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Participation

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F-D: 1-13)

13 points

13 %

Satisfactory (C: 14-16)

16 points

16 %

Proficient (B: 17-18)

18 points

18 %

Exemplary (A: 19-20)

20 points

20 %

Criterion Score

Participation in Discussion

Add Feedback

No responses to other classmates were posted in this discussion forum.

 

May include one or more of the following: *Comments to only one other student's post. *Comments are not substantive, such as just one line or saying, “Good job” or “I agree. *Comments are off topic.

 

Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote.

 

Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts on more than one day. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote.

 

Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructor's comment (if applicable) on two or more days. Responses demonstrate an analysis of peers’ comments, building on previous posts. Comments extend and deepen meaningful conversation and may include a follow-up question.

 

/ 20

/ 20

*

Criterion score has been overridden

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Writing

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F-D: 1-13)

13 points

13 %

Satisfaction (C: 14-16)

16 points

16 %

Proficient (B: 17-18)

18 points

18 %

Exemplary (A: 19-20)

20 points

20 %

Criterion Score

Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy

Add Feedback

No postings for which to evaluate language and grammar exist.

 

Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar, mechanics, spelling, use of slang, and incomplete or missing citations and references. If required for the assignment, did not use course, text, and/or outside readings (where relevant) to support work.

 

Some spelling, grammatical, and/or structural errors are present. Some errors in formatting citations and references are present. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for initial post but not comments to other students. Sources include course/text readings but outside sources (when relevant) include non-academic/authoritative, such as Wikis and .com resources.

 

Minor errors in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in the initial posting are present. Minor errors in formatting citations and references may exist. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and some of the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules).

 

Minor to no errors exist in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in both the initial post and comments to others. Formatting of citations and references is correct. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules).

 

/ 20

/ 20

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Rubric Total Score Total Total Score

Clear Override

/ 80

/ 80

*

Criterion score has been overridden

 

 

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Submission0 points minimum

There was no submission for this assignment.

Clear Override

Emerging (F to D Range)1 point minimum

Satisfactory progress has not been met on the competencies for this assignment.

Clear Override

Satisfactory (C Range)56 points minimum

Satisfactory progress has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment.

Clear Override

Proficient (B Range)64 points minimum

Proficiency has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment.

Clear Override

Exemplary (A Range)72 points minimum

The competencies for this assignment have been mastered.

Clear Override

Overall Feedback

 

 

Close

 

Bottom of Form

 

 

[{"c_rubricpreview

 

[{"3":["grid","pag

 

9HI2ZX6cJUuQSn

 

 

-8005007308463